Table 3.
Fidelity scores assessed using video-recordings across participants*
| Participant number | Overall sessions |
| Participant 1 | 88.9 (75, 100) |
| Participant 2 | 83.3 (41.7, 100) |
| Participant 3 | 100 (67.5, 100) |
| Participant 4† | 96.7 (88.9, 100) |
| Participant 5 | 75 (45, 100) |
| Participant 6 | 100 (80, 100) |
| Participant 7 | 100 (89.9, 100) |
| Participant 8† | 100 (95.8, 100) |
| Participant 9 | 92.9 (50, 100) |
| Participant 10 | 93.7 (77.5, 100) |
| Participant 11† | 75 (50, 97.2) |
| Participant 12 | 73.8 (18.8, 100) |
| Participant 13 | 100 (67, 100) |
| Participant 14 | 100 (79, 100) |
| Participant 15 | 85 (56, 100) |
| Participant 16 | 100 (75, 100) |
| Participant 17 | 100 (80, 100) |
| Participant 18† | 100 (81, 100) |
*Values are median% (IQR).
†Participants dropped out. The percentage fidelity score is calculated using scores from the sessions attended.