Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Struct Equ Modeling. 2021 Mar 23;28(4):609–621. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2021.1878895

Table 3.

Monte Carlo Analysis of Bias in the Standard Errors for the Unstandardized Effect Size (GMA D)

N Coverage Percent Bias Confidence Interval Bias
Delta BTSP Delta BTSP Delta BTSP
S I S I S I S I S I S I
50 .937 .937 .942 .940 3.34 3.74 .64 1.34 .013 .013 .008 .010
100 .943 .943 .944 .944 1.37 1.91 .23 .77 .007 .007 .006 .006
150 .942 .946 .943 .947 1.67 1.33 .97 .63 .008 .004 .007 .003
250 .947 .947 .949 .948 .72 .61 .36 .31 .003 .003 .001 .002
500 .945 .948 .946 .947 1.02 .43 .76 .29 .005 .002 .004 .003

Mdn .943 .946 .944 .947 1.37 1.33 .64 .63 .007 .004 .006 .003

Note. Coverage = 95% coverage, Confidence Interval Bias = difference between coverage and .950, delta = delta method, BTSP = bootstrap, S = GMA D from slope difference, I = GMA D from intercept difference.