Table 1.
Excited state lifetimes and quantum yields for emission and singlet oxygen production for Ru-ip-nTunder different conditions.
| Complex | τem.[c] | τTA.[c] | Ф em.[c] | Ф Δ[d] | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aerated (μs) | Deaerated (μs) | Aerated (μs) | Deaerated (μs) | Aerated | Deaerated | ||
| Ru-ip-0T | 0.4 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 0.038 | 0.05 | 0.68 |
| Ru-ip-1T | 0.4 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 0.044 | 0.06 | 0.61 |
| Ru-ip-2T | 0.3; 1[a] | 0.6; 11[a] | 1.4 | 14 | 0.006 | 0.04 | 0.71 |
| Ru-ip-3T | 0.3 | 0.6 | 1.4 | 48 | -[b] | 4.8×10−4 | 0.77 |
| Ru-ip-4T | 0.3 | 0.6 | 1.4 | 29 | -[b] | 8.1×10−4 | 0.81 |
τem. : emission lifetime; τTA.: recovery lifetime; em.: quantum yield of emission; Δ: singlet oxygen quantum yield. Singlet oxygen was determined spectroscopically by monitoring its emission centered at 1275 nm in aerated MeCN. [Ru(bpy)3][PF6]2 is used as the reference obtaining em.[27] and Δ.[28]
A biexponential decay of the respective signal is observed.
Emission is too low to obtain a reasonable estimate of the emission quantum yield.
Solvent used is H2O.
Solvent used is MeCN.