Table 3.
Accuracy of the TI method for the different numbers of λ simulations for Steps 1 and 2 of the CSC protocol in water (Figure 1a).a The energy is in the unit of kcal/mol.
|
(Step 1) |
(Step 2) |
|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N=2 | 3 | 6 | 11 | 19 | N=2 | 3 | 6 | 11 | 19 | |
| 1. K+ | 77.37 | 74.10 | 73.51 | 73.46 | 73.56 | −1.96 | −2.01 | −2.12 | −2.12 | −2.14 |
| 2. Cl− | 99.41 | 95.97 | 94.91 | 94.77 | 94.75 | 13.30 | −7.44 | −4.12 | −3.18 | −2.60 |
| 3. Na+ | 97.78 | 94.60 | 93.86 | 93.79 | 93.67 | −1.08 | −1.48 | −1.62 | −1.62 | −1.66 |
| 4. Ca2+ | 350.47 | 369.48 | 368.72 | 369.25 | 369.17 | −0.72 | −1.15 | −1.29 | −1.32 | −1.31 |
| 5. Glycine | −46.42 | −48.47 | −48.92 | −48.99 | −48.99 | 11.85 | −5.10 | −1.82 | −1.16 | −0.92 |
| 6. Ethanol | 13.86 | 12.42 | 12.16 | 12.10 | 12.12 | −8.27 | −3.83 | −1.66 | −1.22 | −1.14 |
| 7. imidazole | 16.74 | 15.25 | 14.90 | 14.86 | 14.85 | −6.70 | −2.64 | −0.57 | −0.18 | −0.20 |
| 8. Imidazolium− | 14.56 | 12.80 | 12.49 | 12.51 | 12.55 | −5.70 | −1.69 | 0.35 | 0.78 | 0.77 |
| 9. Methylamine | −6.74 | −7.87 | −8.09 | −8.12 | −8.12 | −5.53 | −2.75 | −1.39 | −1.02 | −0.87 |
| 10. Methylammonium− | 45.12 | 42.79 | 42.60 | 42.58 | 42.60 | −5.53 | −2.69 | −1.29 | −0.95 | −0.85 |
| 11. Acetic acid | 79.69 | 77.88 | 77.62 | 77.37 | 77.40 | −9.33 | −4.21 | −1.68 | −1.15 | −1.05 |
| 12. Acetate ion− | 151.13 | 148.02 | 146.84 | 146.72 | 146.49 | −8.86 | −4.03 | −1.70 | −1.23 | −0.99 |
| 13. Phospho-tyrosine2− | 244.52 | 237.72 | 233.78 | 232.90 | 231.83 | 72.26 | −37.88 | −22.30 | 18.60 | −17.53 |
| MSD b | 1.97 | 0.99 | 0.19 | 0.10 | −9.28 | −3.57 | −0.82 | −0.19 | ||
| MUD b | 4.85 | 0.99 | 0.28 | 0.13 | 9.48 | 3.64 | 0.84 | 0.20 | ||
The λ values in the N=2, 3, 6 and 11-point λ simulation results are: for N=2, λ=0 and 1; for N=3, λ=0, 0.5 and 1; for N=6, λ=0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8 and 1; and for N=11, λ=0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9 and 1, respectively.
MSD and MUD are relative to the N=19 simulation results of each step.