Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 7;61(2):321–332. doi: 10.1007/s10840-020-00778-y

Table 3.

Predictive scores for LR and VLR

LR (+) (n = 100) LR (−) (n = 188) p value VLR (+) (n = 32) VLR (−) (n = 173) p value
General scores
  CHADS2 1.0 (1.0, 2.0) 1.0 (1.0, 2.0) 0.074 1.0 (1.0, 2.0) 1.0 (1.0, 2.0) 0.431
  CHA2DS2-VASc 3.0 (2.0, 4.0) 2.0 (1.0, 4.0) 0.046 2.0 (2.0, 4.0) 2.0 (1.0, 4.0) 0.526
  HAS-BLED 2.0 (1.0, 2.0) 1.0 (1.0, 2.0) 0.010 2.0 (1.0, 2.0) 1.0 (1.0, 2.0) 0.105
  HATCH 1.0 (1.0, 2.0) 1.0 (1.0, 2.0) 0.075 1.0 (1.0, 2.0) 1.0 (1.0, 2.0) 0.592
Specific scores
  APPLE 2.0 (2.0, 3.0) 2.0 (1.0, 3.0) < 0.001 2.0 (2.0, 3.0) 2.0 (1.0, 3.0) 0.040
  DR-FLASH 3.0 (3.0, 4.0) 3.0 (1.0, 4.0) < 0.001 3.0 (3.0, 4.0) 3.0 (2.0, 4.0) 0.013
  MB-LATER 2.0 (1.0, 3.0) 1.0 (1.0, 2.0) < 0.001 2.0 (1.8, 3.0) 1.0 (1.0, 2.0) < 0.001
  BASE-AF2 2.0 (2.0, 4.0) 2.0 (1.0, 3.0) < 0.001 2.0 (1.0, 3.0) 2.0 (1.0, 3.0) 0.112
  PLAAF 2.0 (2.0, 3.0) 2.0 (1.0, 2.0) < 0.001 2.0 (2.0, 3.0) 2.0 (1.0, 2.0) 0.007
  ATLAS 9.0 (7.0, 12.0) 8.0 (5.0, 11.0) 0.004 8.0 (6.0, 11.0) 8.0 (5.0, 11.0) 0.457
  SCALE-CryoAF 5.0 (3.8, 8.0) 3.0 (0, 4.0) < 0.001 4.0 (3.0, 8.0) 3.0 (0, 5.0) 0.015

Values are given as median (25th, 75th interquartile range)