Kragh et al. (2019) [58] |
Xception CNN model [57] paired with custom RNN model |
EmbryoScope time-lapse images |
8.664 embryo |
Assigning ICM and TE grades |
– |
ICM ± 65%, TE ± 69% |
Khosravi et al. (2019) [60] |
Inception-V1 model [41] along with CHAID decision tree [64] |
EmbryoScope time-lapse image |
12,001 time-lapse image up to seven focal depths |
Classifying embryo into good and poor quality & predicting pregnancy probability |
– |
Grading precision: 95.7% |
Chen et al. (2019) [59] |
ResNet50 model [40] |
Microscopic images |
171,239 static images from 16,201 embryos of 4,146 IVF cycles |
Automatic grading based on Blastocysts Development, ICM, and TE grades |
Only detected D5/D6 embryo images for prediction |
Blastocyst: 96.24%, TE: 84.42%, ICM: 91.08% |
VerMilyea et al. (2020) [54] |
Ensemble of multiple ResNet models [40] and DenseNet modesl [31] |
Optical light microscope images |
1667 microscopic images of embryo in Day 5 |
Predicting embryo viability |
Analysis only on Day 5 embryos |
64.3% prediction accuracy |
Bormann et al. (2020) [61] |
Xception [57] with Genetic Algorithm |
Vitro-life Embryoscope time-lapse videos |
2440 static human embryo images recorded at 113hpi |
Embryo selection based on embryo quality and implantation outcome |
Only utilizes images from single timepoint even with time-lapse |
Based on: embryo quality = 90.97% implantation outcome = 82.76% |
Kanakasabapathy et al. (2020) [55] |
Xception [57] + Genetic Algorithm |
3469 recorded video from 543 patients |
Training: 1190, Validation: 511 |
Embryo selection based on morphology quality |
– |
SET: ± 83.51% DET: ± 96.90% |
Thirumalaraju et al. (2020) [62] |
Multiple tested, Xception [57] deemed as best |
Embryoscope time-lapse system |
Training: 1188 images Validation: 510 images Additional 742 as test |
Grading blastocysts |
– |
± 90.90% |
Silver et al. (2020) [63] |
An implementation of CNN (no specific architecture were named) |
Time-lapse videos |
8789 videos in total Additionally 272 were KID labeled |
Embryo grading and implantation prediction |
– |
AUC score of ± 0.82% |