Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 30;11:15511. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-94798-x

Table 1.

Patients’ clinical information and in vitro response to modulators.

Subject
(Gender)
Genotype Functional class Age at sampling procedure Pancreatic
function
FEV1% Bronchiectasis Chronic colonization In vitro response to modulators
CF1 (M) F508del/2183AA>G II/I 15 Insufficiency 45 Yes SA-PA  +  + 
CF2 (F) F508del/2183AA>G II/I 17 Insufficiency 85 Yes (mild) No  + 
CF3 (M) F508del/3849 + 10KbC>T II/V 6 Sufficiency 110 No No  +  + *
CF4 (M) L227R/L227R Undetermined 19 Insufficiency 80 Yes MRSA -
CF5 (F) G542X/R117H-7H I/IV 12 Sufficiency 116 No No -
CF6 (M) F508del/F508del II 18 Insufficiency 57 Yes SA-PA  +  + 
CF7 (M) F508del/1812-1G>A II/I (canonical splicing) 18 Insufficiency 86 Yes SA -

CF1 and CF2 subjects share the same genotype but are unrelated. Pathogenic variants are indicated with their legacy names.

Gender: M (male) F (female); Chronic colonization: SA (Staphylococcus aureus), MRSA (methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus), SA-PA (Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa). Last column describes in vitro nasospheroid response to VX-770 + VX-809 and/or VX-770 + VX-661 assessing FR and AUC analysis in IFRA after live-cell imaging assay (t = 60 min). Responses were categorized according to the statistical differences found between FSK and VX treatment: +  + notable response = observed in both, FR and AUC values; + moderate response = significant differences in FR or AUC values; − no response = no significant differences. * Only responder to VX-770 + VX-661.