Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr;22(4):1217–1224. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2021.22.4.1217

Table 1.

Comparison of Clinical Characteristics between the Combination Treatment and TACE Continuation Groups

Characteristic SOR+TACE
(n = 41)
TACE
(n = 29)
p
Sex 0.856
Male 32 (78%) 24 (83%)
Female 9 (22%) 5 (17%)
Age, years 70 (57–81) 71 (57–76) 0.358
Number of tumors 0.664
<4 16 (39%) 9 (31%)
≥4 25 (61%) 20 (69%)
Tumor size, mm 21 (7–81) 14 (6–33) 0.049
Tumor location 0.426
Hemiliver 12 (29%) 12 (41%)
Whole liver 29 (71%) 17 (59%)
Alpha-fetoprotein, ng/mL 11 (2–769) 26 (3–756) 0.208
PIVKA-II, mAU/mL 32 (12–5908) 48 (20–1609) 0.194
HBsAg 1
Negative 34 (83%) 25 (86%)
Positive 7 (17%) 4 (14%)
HCVAb 0.401
Negative 18 (44%) 9 (31%)
Positive 23 (56%) 20 (69%)
Child–Pugh score 0.545
5 24 (59%) 14 (48%)
6 17 (41%) 15 (52%)
BCLC stage B 1
No 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
Yes 41 (100%) 29 (100%)
Period from first TACE session to refractory, months 10.9 (0.8–64) 18.2 (4.7–63) 0.147
Number of TACE sessions before TACE-refractory 3 (2–7) 3 (2–4) 0.435
Interval between TACE sessions before TACE-refractory, months 4.1 (0.3–19.3) 6.8 (2.3–18.2) 0.043

Data are shown as n (%) or median (90% confidence interval). p-values in bold font indicate; PIVKA-II protein induced by vitamin K absence-II, HCC hepatocellular carcinoma, HBsAg hepatitis B surface antigen, HCVAb hepatitis C virus antibody, TACE transarterial chemoembolization