Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jul 31.
Published in final edited form as: ACS Chem Biol. 2016 Oct 5;11(11):3154–3164. doi: 10.1021/acschembio.6b00730

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

A comparison of 20 different hits ranked by Δδ50 by PrOF NMR and different assay data (signal reduction in 1H CPMG in panel A or PrOF NMR chemical shift perturbation in panel B). A correlation is noticeable between Δδ50 and 1H CPMG signal drop, as well as Δδ50 and W81 chemical shift perturbation. While one could expect broadening of W81 to also correlate well, with Brd4 this is not the case. Using a protein with a lower ligandability could result in better rank-ordering with broadening, but with Brd4 many of the tighter binders are already coalescing at 400 μM ligand.