Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 31;20:158. doi: 10.1186/s12933-021-01354-y

Table 3.

Comparison of LV strain among T2DM patients with mild/moderate/severe regurgitation and normal controls

Normal (n = 52) T2DM with mild FMR (n = 21) T2DM with moderate FMR (n = 19) T2DM with severe FMR (n = 19)
LVEF, % 62.6 ± 5.8 47.4 ± 12.0* 49.6 (28.6, 62.8)* 40.2 ± 19.5*
PS, %
Radial 38.4 ± 8.7 22.8 ± 8.6* 16.1 ± 17.4*† 15.6 ± 10.3*†
Circumferential − 19.9 ± 2.7 14.4 ± 4.2* 11.0 ± 5.1*† 8.9 (5.2, 13.8) *†
Longitudinal − 14.8 ± 3.3 11.1 ± 3.2* 8.8 ± 3.4*† 7.2 (5.6, 10.9) *†
PSSR, 1/s
Radial 2.1 ± 0.7 1.3 ± 0.6* 1.0 ± 0.5* 1.1 (0.5, 1.1) *†
Circumferential − 1.0 (− 1.1, − 0.9) − 0.8 ± 0.3 − 0.7 ± 0.3* − 0.6 ± 0.3*
Longitudinal − 0.8 (− 0.9, − 0.6) − 0.7 (− 0.8, − 0.6) − 0.5 ± 0.2* − 0.4 (− 0.5, − 0.3) *†
PDSR, 1/s
Radial − 2.8 ± 0.9 − 1.5 ± 0.6* − 1.0 ± 0.6* − 0.9 ± 0.5*†
Circumferential 1.2 ± 0.3 0.9 ± 0.3* 0.7 ± 0.3*† 0.6 ± 0.3*†
Longitudinal 0.9 (0.8, 1.2) 0.6 (0.5, 1.0) * 0.6 ± 0.2* 0.5 ± 0.2*†

*P < 0.05, T2DM with FMR vs. normal; †P < 0.05, T2DM with severe/moderate FMR vs. T2DM with mild FMR

T2DM type 2 diabetes mellitus,FMR functional mitral regurgitation, PS peak strain, PSSR peak systolic strain rate, PDSR peak diastolic strain rate