Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 8;2(7):466–475. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.27.BJO-2021-0027.R1

Table IV.

Comparison of fractures by stem fixation philosophy.

Variable CB stems PTS stems p-value*
Total, n 87 497
Sex, n (%) 0.005
Female 59 (67.8) 255 (51.3)
Male 28 (32.2) 242 (48.7)
Median age, yrs (IQR) 83.00 (77.00 to 88.00) 79.00 (71.00 to 86.00) 0.003
Stem brand, n (%) < 0.001
C stem AMT 0 (0.0) 20 (4.0)
C stem classic 0 (0.0) 39 (7.8)
Charnley 87 (100.0) 0 (0.0)
CPT 0 (0.0) 201 (40.4)
Exeter 0 (0.0) 237 (47.7)
UCS grade, n (%) 0.003
AG 3 (3.4) 4 (0.8)
AL 0 (0.0) 18 (3.6)
B1 30 (34.5) 248 (49.9)
B2 25 (28.7) 127 (25.6)
B3 12 (13.8) 40 (8.0)
C 17 (19.5) 60 (12.1)
AO/OTA type, n (%) < 0.001
Oblique 8 (9.2) 77 (15.5)
Transverse 24 (27.6) 24 (4.8)
Wedge 7 (8.0) 17 (3.4)
Spiral 45 (51.7) 307 (61.8)
Metaphyseal split 0 (0.0) 50 (10.1)
NC 3 (3.4) 22 (4.4)
*

Chi-squared test.

CB, composite beam; IQR, indicates interquartile range; N/A, not applicable; OTA, Orthopaedic Trauma Association; PTS, polished taper-slip; UCS, Unified Classification System.