Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 26;6(7):567–580. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2021.05.004

Table 4.

Main Results of CMR Imaging in Patients With and Without ID

No ID (n = 71) ID (n = 54) P Value
Area at risk, ga 43.7 ± 2.7 39.6 ± 2.2 0.266
Area at risk, % of LV massa 35.3 ± 1.9 32.6 ± 1.7 0.296
Infarct size, g 20.7 ± 1.6 30.1 ± 2.9 0.003
Infarct size, % of LV mass 16.8 ± 1.2 22.8 ± 1.4 0.002
Infarct size, % of the area at riska 52.8 ± 3.5 68.0 ± 3.6 0.004
No. segments with MVO 0 (0-2) 2 (0-3) 0.002
≥3 segments with MVO, % 12 (17.9) 20 (40.0) 0.008
Any hemorrhage, % 9 (13.6) 10 (22.7) 0.217
Hemorrhage, % of LV mass 0.3 ± 0.1 0.5 ± 0.2 0.238
Relative increase in LVEDV, %b 3.7 ± 2.5 15.9 ± 4.1 0.012
Relative increase in LVESV, %b -7.2 ± 3.0 9.3 ± 4.7 0.002
Increase in LVEF, %b 6.4 ± 0.9 3.9 ± 1.1 0.080
Adverse LV remodeling, %b 9 (14.1) 17 (37.8) 0.004

Values are mean ± SEM or median (25th-75th percentiles).

CMR = cardiac magnetic resonance; ID = iron deficiency; LV = left ventricular; LVEDV = left ventricular end-diastolic volume; LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction; LVESV = left ventricular end-systolic volume.

a

Values from 90 patients with adequate measurements.

b

Values from the 109 patients (45 with ID and 64 without ID) with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging repeated at 6 months.