Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 4;73(3):e587–e593. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1674

Table 3.

Regression Model for Composite Maternal–Fetus/Infant Outcome Score (Higher Score Is Worse) for the TB APPRISE Study

Univariable Results Multivariable results
Predictors and Groupa Slopeb Estimate 95% CI P Slopec Estimate 95% CI P
Study arm/ARV regimen at baseline interaction .07 .049
 EFV-containing regimen at baseline: immediate INH – deferred INH 1.2 (−3.5, 5.9) .62 1.5 (−3.2, 6.2) .53
 NVP-containing regimen at baseline: immediate INH – deferred INH 13.1 (1.2, 25.1) 0.04 14.3 (2.4, 26.2) 0.02
HBsAG positive vs negative 7.3 (4.3, 18.9) .22
Hepatitis C positive vs negative serology 10.6 (−11.5, 35.6) .35
CD4 count (cells/mm3) (per 10 cells higher) −.04 (−.1, .05) .33
HIV RNA < LLQ vs ≥LLQ −6.2 (−10.7, −1.8) .006 −6.7 (−11.2, −2.1) .004
Maternal age (years) (per year of age) −.2 (−.6, .2) .35
Midupper arm circumference (ref: obese >31) (in cm): .04 .02
 Malnourished: <23 13.3 (2.3, 24.2) .02 15.1 (3.7, 26.6) .01
 Normal: 23–31 −.5 (−5.3, 4.4) .85 −.3 (−5.2, 4.5) .88
Initiated cotrimoxazole before or at study entry vs never 3.7 (−.7, 8.0) .10 4.8 (.4, 9.2) .03
Current vs never/previous smoking 9.5 (−6.5, 25.5) .25
Food insecure vs not food insecure 1.2 (−5.2, 7.7) .71
Twin pregnancy vs singleton 21.2 (1.4, 41.0) .04 20.5 (−.2, 41.2) .052

All models included gestational age strata (parameter estimates and P values not shown as gestational age was a stratification factor in the randomization). P values for overall tests and for covariates with >2 levels relative to the reference category are from F tests. Reference categories are omitted. Abbreviations: APPRISE, Ante vs. Postpartum Prevention with INH in HIV Seropositive mothers and their Exposed infants; ARV, antiretroviral; CI, confidence interval; EFV, efavirenz; HBsAG, hepatitis B surface antigen; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; INH, isoniazid; LLQ, lower limit of quantification; NVP, nevirapine; ref, reference; TB, tuberculosis; TB APPRISE,TB Ante vs. Postpartum Prevention with INH in HIV Seropositive mothers and their Exposed infants.

aFor the study arm/ARV regimen at baseline interaction, the difference between immediate and deferred INH are provided by receipt of an EFV- or NVP-containing regimen at baseline.

bUnadjusted regression coefficient (if categorical, this is the difference in mean score from the reference group).

cAdjusted regression coefficient was adjusted for parameter estimates shown. For study arm–ARV regimen interaction, slope estimates are for pairwise comparisons of immediate vs deferred INH within ARV groups.