Table 3.

ROC correlation analysis.

	CON vs PCOS		L_CON vs L_PCOS		H_CON vs H_PCOS
	AUC (95%CI)	P	AUC (95%CI)	P	AUC (95%CI)	P
Actinomycetaceae	0.689 (0.576, 0.802)	0.003	0.671 (0.527, 0.815)	0.04	0.769 (0.599, 0.938)	0.011
Bacteroidaceae	0.306 (0.189, 0.423)	0.003	0.219 (0.092, 0.347)	0.001	0.35 (0.15, 0.55)	0.155
Enterobacteriaceae	0.705 (0.597, 0.814)	0.001	0.691 (0.548, 0.834)	0.022	0.804 (0.644,0.964)	0.004
Oscillospiraceae	0.327 (0.21, 0.443)	0.007	0.336 (0.193, 0.48)	0.049	0.213 (0.041,0.384)	0.006
Streptococcaceae	0.747 (0.636, 0.857)	＜0.001	0.847 (0.748, 0.947)	＜0.001	0.663 (0.461, 0.864)	0.123
Tannerellaceae	0.36 (0.24, 0.481)	0.029	0.245 (0.108, 0.382)	0.002	0.463 (0.256, 0.669)	0.722
Ruminococcaceae	0.46 (0.332, 0.588)	0.532	0.569 (0.401, 0.736)	0.41	0.296 (0.108, 0.483)	0.053
norank_o_Clostridia_ UCG-014	0.282 (0.166, 0.398)	0.001	0.286 (0.135, 0.437)	0.01	0.25 (0.07, 0.43)	0.018
model	0.81 (0.714, 0.906)	＜0.001	0.839 (0.722, 0.956)	＜0.001	0.829 (0.669, 0.99)	0.002

The bold part in the table represents statistics, P < 0.05, with statistical significance.