Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 2;379(2206):20200331. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2020.0331

Table 1.

Mechanical properties of native chitin from different sources, nanofibrillated chitin and chitin nanocrystals.

material type/chitin source hydration state Young's Modulus (GPa) tensile strength (MPa) crystalline structure and crystallinity % ref
fibre-chitin from snow crab (C. opilio) dry 59.3 α-chitin [66]
mantis shrimp saddle chitin and protein bound dry 240 α-chitin [64]
mantis shrimp saddle chitin only dry 80 α-chitin [64]
fibre–cellulose dry 86 Cellulose I [67]
fibre–kevlar 85 [68]
beetle elytra–Potosia brevitarsis dry 5.45 [69]
beetle elytra–Allomyrina dichotoma dry 4.34 130 [69]
beetle elytra–Pachynoda sinuata dry 0.09–1.52 36–69 [70]
regenerated chitin (RC) films/nanopapers–crabs wet 0.33 20 [71]
RC films/nanopapers–crabs dry 1.095 36 [71]
RC films/nanopapers–squid pan(Illex argentines) 6.7 277 89% β-chitin [72]
RC films/nanopapers–α-chitin from crabs dry 9 156.5 α-chitin [73]
RC films/nanopapers–prawn shells dry 7.3 89.4 α-chitin [74]
RC films/nanopapers–mushroom (Agaricus bisporus) dry 6.9 204.4 [75]