Table 4.
Factors | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Indicator | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
Genre: Pop | 0.85 | |||||||
Genre: Folk | 0.61 | |||||||
SM Usefulness: General | –0.57 | |||||||
Collab: Different time zones | –0.52 | |||||||
SM Usefulness: Collab | –0.43 | |||||||
Genre: Rock | 0.43 | –0.41 | ||||||
Genre: Blues | 0.41 | 0.33 | –0.33 | |||||
Genre: Electronic | 0.35 | 0.32 | ||||||
Inspiration: Social issues | 0.41 | 0.74 | ||||||
Inspiration: Politics | 0.71 | –0.36 | ||||||
Inspiration: Other people's lives | 0.7 | |||||||
Inspiration: Literature | 0.56 | |||||||
Genre: Country | –0.4 | 0.31 | ||||||
Internet Use: Music creation | 0.36 | 0.36 | ||||||
Style: Electric | 0.67 | |||||||
Style: Loudness | 0.59 | |||||||
Style: Liveness | 0.58 | |||||||
Style: Originality | –0.49 | |||||||
Inspiration: Other | 0.48 | |||||||
Genre: Religious | –0.47 | |||||||
Inspiration: Religion | –0.4 | |||||||
Genre: Alternative | 0.34 | |||||||
Collab: New collaborators | 0.81 | |||||||
Collab: Initiative | 0.64 | |||||||
Collab: Same Style | 0.43 | |||||||
Internet Use: Communication | 0.68 | |||||||
Internet Use: Any | 0.66 | |||||||
Internet Use: Music Consumption | 0.46 | |||||||
Genre: Other | 0.38 | |||||||
Inspiration: Nostalgia | 0.63 | |||||||
Genre: Metal | –0.51 | |||||||
Inspiration: Personal Life | 0.49 | 0.34 | ||||||
Inspiration: Nature | 0.48 | –0.31 | ||||||
Style: Collaborative | 0.42 | –0.44 | ||||||
Inspiration: Science | 0.4 | |||||||
Style: Length | –0.35 | |||||||
Genre: Hip-Hop | 0.69 | |||||||
Genre: Soundtrack | 0.58 | |||||||
Genre: Classical | 0.54 | |||||||
Style: Speed | –0.43 | |||||||
Genre: Soul | 0.35 | |||||||
Style: Happiness | 0.34 | |||||||
Time Making music: Solo | 0.55 | |||||||
Time Making music: Live | 0.36 | |||||||
Genre: Jazz | 0.31 |
A promax oblique rotation was applied in obtaining these loadings to account for possible colinearities among the factors. Only loadings with magnitude greater than 0.3 are shown.