Skip to main content
. 2021 May 25;51(10):1593–1624. doi: 10.1017/S003329172100180X

Table 2.

All Mendelian randomization (MR) studies included for qualitative synthesis, with their identifying information, description of the data samples used for exposure and outcome variable(s), ancestry of those samples, the independence of the include SNPs, whether or not proxies were used, and whether or not a correction for multiple testing was applied

ID Author year GWAS sample exposure variable(s) Ancestry exposure sample GWAS sample outcome variable(s) Ancestry outcome sample Independence of the SNPs (LD threshold or otherwise) Proxies used, and if so, LD Correction multiple testing
1 Zhou et al. (2019a) Okbay et al. (2016), N = 293 723 European Thorgeirsson et al. (2010) (Tobacco and Genetics (TAG) consortium), smoking initiation effective-N = 72 710, smoking cessation effective-N = 41 278 European Independent SNPs as reported in exposure GWAS were selected Yes, LD r2 > 0.8 None
2 Zeng et al. (2019) Okbay et al. (2016), N = 293 723; Lee et al. (2018), N = 1 131 881 European Thorgeirsson et al. (2010) (TAG consortium) effective-N = 72 710 European Independent SNPs as reported in exposure GWAS were selected No None
3 Gage et al. (2018) Okbay et al. (2016), N = 305 072 (Discovery and replication sample, without 23andme) European Thorgeirsson et al. (2010) (TAG consortium), smoking initiation effective-N = 72 710, cigarettes per day – N = 38 181, smoking cessation effective-N = 41 278; Ware et al. (2016) – N = 4548 European Independent SNPs as reported in exposure GWAS were selected Yes, LD r2 > 0.9 None
4 Tillmann et al. (2017) Okbay et al. (2016), N = 349 306 European Thorgeirsson et al., 2010 (TAG consortium) effective-N = 72 710 European LD r2 < 0.1 Yes, LD r2 > 0.8 None
5 Carter et al. (2019) Individual-level MR: UKB (UK Biobank), N = 318 147; Summary-level MR: Lee et al. (2018), N = 1 131 881 European Individual-level MR: UKB, N = 318 147; Summary-level MR: Wootton et al. (2019), N = 462 690 European LD r2 < 0.1 education; LD r2 < 0.001 smoking No None
6 Sanderson et al. (2019) Individual-level MR: UKB, N = 120 050; Summary-level MR: Lee et al. (2018), N = 1 131 881 European Individual-level MR: UKB, N = 120 050; Summary-level MR: Thorgeirsson et al. (2010) (TAG consortium) smoking initiation effective-N = 72 710; smoking cessation effective-N = 41 278 European LD r2 < 0.001 No None
7 Gage et al. (2020) Liu et al. (2019a (GSCAN consortium) without UK Biobank (since it is not explicitly mentioned that these were excluded, it is assumed that 23andme data were included), smoking initiation, N = 848 460; Wootton et al. (2019), N = 462 690 European Okbay et al. (2016), N = 293 723; Cognitive functioning UKB (Neale lab GWAS: http://www.nealelab.is/uk-biobank), N = 117 131 European Independent SNPs as reported in exposure GWAS were selected No None
8a Fu et al. (2019) The Health and Retirement Cohort, N = 11 246 European The Health and Retirement Cohort, N = 11 246 European None
9 North et al. (2015) Healthy Aging across the Life Course (HALCyon) consortium, N = 22 329 European HALCyon consortium, N = 22 329 European n.a. (1 SNP) No Bonferroni
10a Adams (2019) Wootton et al., 2019, N = 462 690; Cognitive functioning UKB, N = 149 051; Okbay et al. (2016), N = 170 911 European Wootton et al. (2019), N = 462 690; Cognitive functioning UKB, N = 149 051; Okbay et al. (2016), N = 170 911 European LD r2 < 0.01 No False Discovery Rate (FDR)
11 Østergaard et al. (2015) Thorgeirsson et al. (2010) (TAG consortium), smoking initiation effective-N = 72 710, cigarettes per day – N = 38 181 European Lambert et al. (2013) (International Genomics of Alzheimer's disease's Project (IGAP)) effective-N = 46 668 European LD r2 < 0.01 Yes, LD r2 > 0.8 Bonferroni
12 Gibson et al. (2019) Summary-level MR: Jones et al. (2016) – N = 128 266; Hammerschlag et al. (2017), effective-N = 92 415; Thorgeirsson et al. (2010) (TAG consortium) smoking initiation effective-N = 72 710, cigarettes per day – N = 38 181, smoking cessation effective-N = 41 278; Individual-level MR: UKB – N = 335 708 participants (computed as the biggest sample from Table 1: 184 184 + 118 181 + 33 343) European Summary-level MR: Jones et al. (2016), N = 128 266; Hammerschlag et al. (2017), effective-N = 92 415; Thorgeirsson et al. (2010) (TAG consortium) smoking initiation effective-N = 72 710, cigarettes per day – N = 38 181, smoking cessation effective-N = 41 278; Individual-level MR: UKB – N = 335 708 participants (computed as the biggest sample from Table 1: 184 184 + 118 181 + 33 343) European LD r2 < 0.001 Yes, LD r2 ⩾ 0.8 None
13 Millard et al. (2019) UKB, N = 182 961, never smokers; N = 150 831, ever smokers European UKB, N = 182 961, never smokers; N = 150 831, ever smokers European n.a. (1 SNP) No Bonferonni & FDR (note that this is a PHEWAS)
14 Jansen et al. (2019) Jansen et al. (2019), N = 1.3 million; Thorgeirsson et al. (2010) (TAG consortium), N = 38 181 European Jansen et al. (2019), N = 1.3 million; Thorgeirsson et al. (2010) (TAG consortium), N = 38 181 European LD r2 < 0.1 No Bonferroni
15 Lane et al. (2019) Frequent insomnia symptoms UKB effective-N = 235 787; Any insomnia symptoms UKB effective-N = 329 839 European Thorgeirsson et al. (2010) (TAG consortium) smoking initiation effective-N = 72 710, cigarettes per day – N = 38 181, smoking cessation effective-N = 41 278, age at initiation – N = 24 114 European LD r2 > 0.8 No Bonferroni
16 Bjorngaard et al. (2013) The Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT) Cohort, N = 53 601 European HUNT cohort, N = 53 601 European n.a. (1 SNP) No None
17 Lewis et al. (2011) The Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) Cohort, N = 6.294 European ALSPAC cohort, N = 6.294 European n.a. (1 SNP) No None
18 Taylor et al. (2014a) The Causal Analysis Research in Tobacco and Alcohol (CARTA) consortium, N = 127 632 (58 176 never smokers, 37 428 former smokers, 32 028 current smokers) European CARTA consortium, N = 127 632 (58 176 never smokers, 37 428 former smokers, 32 028 current smokers) European n.a. (1 SNP) Yes, rs16 969968 or proxy rs1051730 None
19 Skov-Ettrup et al. (2017) The Copenhagen General Population study (CGP), N = 90 108 European The Copenhagen General Population study (CGP), N = 90 108 European n.a. (1 SNP) No None
20 Wootton et al. (2019) Wootton et al. (2019) UKB, N = 462 690; Liu et al. (2019a) (GSCAN consortium) smoking initiation, N = 1.2 million; Schizophrenia working group PGC, 2014 effective-N = 111 486; Wray et al. (2018) effective-N = 374 559 Predominantly European (small Asian cohorts in schiz GWAS) Wootton et al. (2019) UKB, N = 462 690; Liu et al. (2019a) (GSCAN consortium); smoking initiation, N = 599 289; Schizophrenia working group PGC, 2014 effective-N = 111 486; Wray et al. (2018) effective-N = 141 380 Predominantly European (small Asian cohorts in schiz GWAS) LD r2 < 0.001 Yes, LD r2 ⩾ 0.8 None
21 Vermeulen et al. (2019) Liu et al. (2019a) (GSCAN consortium) smoking initiation, N = 1.2 million; Wootton et al. (2019), N = 462 690; Stahl et al. (2019) effective-N = 49 367 European Liu et al. (2019a) (GSCAN consortium) smoking initiation, N = 1.2 million, cigarettes per day, N = 263 954; smoking cessation, N = 312 821; Wootton et al. (2019), N = 462 690; Stahl et al. (2019) effective-N = 49 367 European Independent SNPs as reported in exposure GWAS were selected No None
22a Barkhuizen et al. (2020) Liu et al. (2019a) (GSCAN consortium) without 23andMe, N = 632 802; Pain et al. (2018), N = 6297–10 098; Ortega-Alonso et al. (2017), N = 3967–4057; UKB (Neale lab: http://www.nealelab.is/uk-biobank), N = 157 397; Schizophrenia working group of PGC, 2014 effective-N = 111 487; Wray et al. (2018) excluding 23andMe effective-N = 156 582; Stahl et al. (2019) effective-N = 49 367 Predominantly European (small Asian cohorts in schiz GWAS) Liu et al. (2019a) (GSCAN consortium) without 23andMe, N = 632 802; Pain et al. (2018), N = 6297–10 098; Ortega-Alonso et al. (2017), N = 3967–4057; UKB (Neale lab: http://www.nealelab.is/uk-biobank), N = 157 397; Schizophrenia working group of PGC, 2014 effective-N = 111 487; Wray et al. (2018) excluding 23andMe effective-N = 156 582; Stahl et al. (2019) effective-N = 49 367 Predominantly European (small Asian cohorts in schiz GWAS) Independent SNPs as reported in exposure GWAS were selected or LD r2 < 0.05 No None for MR (the genetic correlations are corrected for multiple testing)
23 Wium-Andersen et al. (2015a) Copenhagen General Population Study (CGPS) and Copenhagen City Heart Study (CCHS) cohorts, N = 63 296 (23 282 never smokers and 40 014 ever smokers) European Copenhagen General Population Study (CGPS) and Copenhagen City Heart Study (CCHS) cohorts, N = 63 296 (23 282 never smokers and 40 014 ever smokers) European n.a. (1 SNP) No None
24 Byrne et al. (2019) UKB, N = 32 510 European Schizophrenia working group of PGC, 2014 effective-N = 99 863 (40 675 cases and 64 643 controls) (note that the PGC schizophrenia working group is referenced but the sample size does not match that in the 2014 PGC publication) European Independent SNPs as reported in exposure GWAS were selected No None
25 Gage et al. (2017b) Schizophrenia working group of PGC, 2014 effective-N = 111 487; Thorgeirsson et al. (2010) (TAG consortium) effective-N = 72 710 Predominantly European (small Asian cohorts in schiz GWAS) Schizophrenia working group of PGC, 2014 effective-N = 111 487; Thorgeirsson et al. (2010) (TAG consortium) smoking initiation effective-N = 72 710, cigarettes per day – N = 38 181, smoking cessation effective-N = 41 278 Predominantly European (small Asian cohorts in schiz GWAS) LD r2 < 0.9 Yes, LD r2 > 0.9 None
26 Fluharty et al. (2018) Demontis et al. (2019) effective-N = 51 205 (note that the reported sample size implies that a small Asian cohort was included); Pappa et al. (2016) (Early Life Epidemiology consortium (EAGLE)) – N = 18 988 Predominantly European (small Asian cohort in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder GWAS) Thorgeirsson et al. (2010) (TAG consortium) smoking initiation effective-N = 72 710; age at initiation – N = 24 114 European Independent SNPs as reported in exposure GWAS were selected Yes, LD r2 ≥ 0.9 None
27 Sallis et al. (2019) Individual-level MR: UKB, N = 273 516; summary-level MR: Thorgeirsson et al. (2010) (TAG consortium) smoking initiation effective-N = 72 710, cigarettes per day – N = 38 181, smoking cessation effective-N = 41 278; Okbay et al. (2016) – N = 170 911; Lo et al. (2017) – N = 122 886 European Individual-level MR: UKB – N = 273 516; summary-level MR: Thorgeirsson et al. (2010) (TAG consortium) smoking initiation effective-N = 72 710, cigarettes per day – N = 38 181, smoking cessation effective-N = 41 278; Okbay et al. (2016) – N = 170 911; Lo et al. (2017) – N = 122 886 European Independent SNPs as reported in exposure GWAS were selected Yes LD r2 ≥ 0.8 None
28a Leppert et al. (2019) Demontis et al. (2019) effective-N = 49 017 European Wootton et al. (2019), N = 462 690 European LD r2 < 0.001 Yes, LD r2 ≥ 0.9 None
29 Harrison et al. (2020a) Individual-level MR: UKB, N = 463 033/2 (split-sample analyses); Summary-level MR: Liu et al. (2019a) (GSCAN consortium) without UKB and 23andMe – N = 249 171; Wootton et al. (2019) – N = 463 033 European Individual-level MR: UKB – N = 463 033/2 (split-sample analyses); Summary-level MR: UKB – N = effective-N = 9661 (2433 cases and 334 766 controls) European Independent SNPs as reported in exposure GWAS were selected Yes, LD r2 ≥ 0.8 None
30 Rosoff et al. (2019) Okbay et al. (2016) – N = 293 723; Elsworth et al. (2017) alcohol intake frequency – N = 462 346, weekly intake – N = 326 801; Karlsson Linnér et al. (2019) – N = 414 343; Walters et al. (2018) – N = 28 657; Sanchez-Roige et al. (2019) – N = 121 604 European Okbay et al. (2016) – N = 293 723; Elsworth et al. (2017) alcohol intake frequency – N = 462 346, weekly intake – N = 326 801; Karlsson Linnér et al. (2019) – N = 414 343; Walters et al. (2018) – N = 28 657; Sanchez-Roige et al. (2019) – N = 121 604 European LD r2 = 0.001 It is mentioned a proxy was used for one SNP but not the LD Bonferroni
31 Zhou et al. (2019b) Lee et al. (2018) – N = 1 131 881 European UKB, N = 334 507 European Independent SNPs as reported in exposure GWAS were selected No None
32 Kumari et al. (2014) English Longitudinal Study of Aging (ELSA) + Whitehall II study + Health, Alcohol and Psychosocial factors in Easter Europe Study (HAPIEE) combined, N = 34 452 European ELSA + Whitehall II study + HAPIEE combined, N = 34 452 European n.a. (1 SNP) No None
33 Almeida et al. (2014a) The Health in Men Study (HIMS) Cohort, N = 3542 Predominantly European HIMS Cohort, N = 3542 Predominantly European n.a. (1 SNP) No None
34 Ritchie et al. (2014) The Lothian Birth Cohort 1936, N = 777 European The Lothian Birth Cohort 1936, N = 777 European Four SNPs as previously reported in candidate-gene literature No None
35 Au Yeung et al. (2012) The Guangzhou Biobank Cohort Study (GBCS), N = 4707 Chinese GBCS, N = 4707 Chinese n.a. (1 SNP) No None
36 Mahedy et al. (2020) Liu et al. (2019a) (GSCAN consortium), N = 941 280 European ALSPAC Cohort 2500 European Independent SNPs as reported in exposure GWAS were selected No None
37 Andrews et al. (2020) Liu et al. (2019a) (GSCAN consortium), N = 537 349; Sanchez-Roige et al. (2019), N = 121 604; Walters et al. (2018) effective-N = 34 780 European Lambert et al. (2013) (IGAP) effective-N = 46 668; Huang et al. (2017) effective-N = 37 002 European LD r2 < 0.001 Yes, LD r2 > 0.8 None
38 Nishiyama et al. (2019) Wakai et al. (2011) (The Japan Multi-Institutional Collaborative Cohort (J-MICC) Study), N = 13 618 Japanese Wakai et al. (2011) (The Japan Multi-Institutional Collaborative Cohort (J-MICC) Study), N = 13 618 Japanese Independent SNPs as reported in exposure GWAS were selected No None
39 Almeida et al. (2014b) HIMS Cohort, N = 3873 Predominantly European HIMS cohort, N = 3873 Predominantly European n.a. (1 SNP) No None
40 Wium-Andersen et al. (2015a) The Copenhagen General Population Study (CGPS) Cohort, N = 78 154 European CGPS Cohort, N = 78 154 European LD r2 < 0.01 No Bonferroni
41 Polimanti et al. (2019) Wray et al. (2018) effective-N = 389 039; Walters et al. (2018) effective-N = 30 053 (note that only unrelated individuals were selected); UKB alcohol use frequency – N = 438 308, alcohol use quantity – N = 307 098 European Wray et al. (2018) effective-N = 389 039; Walters et al. (2018) effective-N = 30 053 (note that only unrelated individuals were selected); UKB alcohol use frequency – N = 438 308, alcohol use quantity – N = 307 098 European LD r2 < 0.01 No Bonferroni
42 Zhou et al. (2020) Howard et al. (2019) effective-N = 684 817; Schizophrenia working group of PGC, 2014 effective-N = 111 487; Stahl et al. (2019) effective-N = 49 367; Nagel et al. (2018) Neuroticism – N = 449 484, depressed affect, – N = 357 957, worry – N = 348 219; Jansen et al. (2019) – N = 1.3 million; Lee et al. (2018) without UKB effective-N = 179 185 (based on the first paragraph of the results section MVP phase1, effective-N = 114 847 + MVP phase 2, effective-N = 37 485 + PGC effective-N = 26 853) Predominantly European (small Asian cohorts in schiz GWAS) Howard et al. (2019) effective-N = 684 817; Schizophrenia working group of PGC, 2014 effective-N = 111 487; Stahl et al. (2019) effective-N = 49 367; Nagel et al. (2018) Neuroticism – N = 449 484, depressed affect – N = 357 957, worry – N = 348 219; Jansen et al. (2019) – N = 1.3 million; Lee et al. (2018) without UKB effective-N = 179 185 (based on the first paragraph of the results section MVP phase1, effective-N = 114 847 + MVP phase2, effective-N = 37 485 + PGC effective-N = 26 853) Predominantly European (small Asian cohorts in schiz GWAS) Independent SNPs as reported in exposure GWAS were selected Yes, LD r2 > 0.8 Bonferonni
43 Irons et al. (2007) McGue et al. (2007) (The Sibling Interaction and Behavior Study), N = 180 East Asian (Korean) McGue et al. (2007) (The Sibling Interaction and Behavior Study), N = 180 East Asian (Korean) n.a. (1 SNP) No None
44 Chao et al. (2017) The BeTwiSt project (adolescents from Beijing), N = 1608 Chinese The BeTwiSt project (adolescents from Beijing), N = 1608 Chinese n.a. (1 SNP) No None
45 Hodgson et al. (2020) Stringer et al. (2016) (International Cannabis Consortium) effective-N = 31 933; Wray et al. (2018) effective-N = 374 559 European Stringer et al. (2016) (International Cannabis Consortium) effective-N = 31 933; Wray et al. (2018) effective-N = 374 559 European LD r2 < 0.1 No p < 0.01 considered significant
46 Soler Artigas et al. (2019) Demontis et al. (2019 effective-N = 49 017; Stringer et al. (2016) (International Cannabis Consortium) effective-N = 31 933 European Demontis et al. (2019 effective-N = 49 017; Stringer et al. (2016) (International Cannabis Consortium) effective-N = 31 933 European LD r2 < 0.05 No None
47 Pasman et al. (2018) Schizophrenia working group of PGC, 2014 effective-N = 111 486; International Cannabis Consortium effective-N = 180 934 Predominantly European (small Asian cohorts in schiz GWAS) Schizophrenia working group of PGC, 2014 effective-N = 111 486; International Cannabis Consortium effective-N = 180 934 Predominantly European (small Asian cohorts in schiz GWAS) LD r2 < 0.001 Yes, LD r2 ≥ 0.8 None
48 Vaucher et al. (2018) Stringer et al., 2016 (International Cannabis Consortium) effective-N = 31 933 European Schizophrenia working group of PGC, 2014 effective-N = 78 227 (note that this sample size is lower than that of the original GWAS, and it was not stated how this subsample was selected) European (unclear whether the Asian cohorts were included) 10 leading SNPs (not genome-wide significant) from the exposure GWAS, no criteria for independence stated No None
49 Gage et al. (2017a) Stringer et al. (2016) (International Cannabis Consortium) effective-N = 31 933; Schizophrenia working group of PGC 2014 effective-N = 111 486 Predominantly European (small Asian cohorts in schiz GWAS) Stringer et al. (2016) (International Cannabis Consortium) effective-N = 31 933; Schizophrenia working group of PGC 2014 effective-N = 111 486 Predominantly European (small Asian cohorts in schiz GWAS) r2 < 0.9 (LD was corrected for with correlation matrix) Yes, LD r2 > 0.9 None
50 Zhou et al. (2018) Meta-analysis of 10 European cohorts (the 1958 British birth cohort (1958BC), UKB, Mothers of Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC-M), Northern Finland Birth Cohorts 1966 (NFBC1966), Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study (YFS), Helsinki Birth Cohort Study (HBCS), Prospective Investigation of the Vasculature in Uppsala Seniors (PIVUS), Uppsala Longitudinal Study of Adult Men (ULSAM), Swedish twin registry (STR), and TwinGene), N = 415 530 (of which 300 760 coffee consumers) European Meta-analysis of 10 European cohorts (1958BC, ALSPAC-M, NFBC1966, YFS, HBCS, PIVUS, ULSAM, STR, and TwinGene), N = 415 530 (of which 300 760 coffee consumers) European Independent SNPs as reported in exposure GWAS were selected Yes, LD r2 1.0 and 0.97 for two SNPs None
51 Treur et al. (2018) Cornelis et al. (2015) (Caffeine Genetics Consortium) – N = 91 462; Cornelis et al. (2016) – N = 9876; Jones et al. (2016) – N = 128 266; Hammerschlag et al. (2017) effective-N = 92 415 European Cornelis et al. (2015) (Caffeine Genetics Consortium), N = 91 462; Cornelis et al. (2016), N = 9876; Jones et al. (2016), N = 128 266; Hammerschlag et al. (2017) effective-N = 92 415 European LD r2 < 0.001 Yes, LD r  ≥ 0.8 None
52 Kwok et al. (2016) Cornelis et al. (2015) (Caffeine Genetics Consortium) – N = 129 788 (note that the reported sample size implies that the trans-ethnic data was used) Predominantly European (~6% African American) Major Depressive Disorder Working Group of PGC, 2013 effective-N = 18 755; Lambert et al. (2013) effective-N = 46 668 European Independent SNPs as reported in exposure GWAS were selected Yes, LD r2 > 0.8 Bonferroni
53 Ding et al. (2019) Health and Retirement Study (HRS) – N = 3935 Not clearly indicated (representative of >50 year-olds in the US) Health and Retirement Study (HRS) N = 3935 Not clearly indicated (representative of >50 year-olds in the US) Independent SNPs as reported in exposure GWAS were selected, after which some were excluded to prevent horizontal pleiotropy No None
54a Yuan et al. (2020a) Lee et al. (2018), N = 1 131 881; Savage et al. (2018), N = 269 867 European Liu et al. (2019a) (GSCAN consortium) alcohol drinks per week, N = 941 280; age at onset smoking, N = 341 427; cigarettes per day, N = 337 334 European Independent SNPs as reported in exposure GWAS were selected No None
55 Davies et al. (2019) Individual-level MR: UKB, N = 93 135; Summary-level MR: Okbay et al. (2016), N = 293 723; Hill et al. (2019), N = 248 723 European Individual-level MR: UKB, N = 93 135 Summary-level MR: UKB smoking initiation effective-N = 136 760, current smoking effective-N = 46 573 European Independent SNPs as reported in exposure GWAS were selected, further clumped with LD r2 < 0.01 No None
56a Davies et al. (2018a) Individual-level MR: UKB – N = 315 436; Summary-level MR: Okbay et al. (2016) – N = 293 723 European Individual-level MR: UKB – N = 315 436; Summary-level MR: not clear from the manuscript, note that the summary-level analyses were used as a sensitivity analysis to check for pleiotropy and were not the main aim European LD r2 < 0.001 Yes, LD r2 = 1 None
57 Harrison et al. (2020b) Individual-level MR: UKB N = 336 997 [N = 336 997/2 (split sample) for lifetime smoking]; Summary-level MR: Liu et al. (2019a) (GSCAN consortium) without UKB and 23andme smoking initiation – N = 249 171, alcohol drinks per week – N = 226 223; UKB Lifetime smoking – N = 336 997 (N = 336 997/2 (split sample)) European Individual-level MR: UKB – N = 336 997; Summary-level MR: UKB Lifetime smoking – N = 336 997 [N = 336 997/2 (split sample)] European Independent SNPs as reported in exposure GWAS were selected Yes, LD r2 > 0.8 Bonferonni
58 Mahedy et al. (2021) Liu et al. (2019a) (GSCAN consortium) effective-N = 1 220 901; Pasman et al. (2018) (International Cannabis Consortium) – N = 184 765 European ALSPAC Cohort, N = 3232 European Independent SNPs as reported in exposure GWAS were selected No None
59 Andrews et al. (2021) Sanchez-Roige et al. (2019) – N = 141 932; Liu et al. (2019a) (GSCAN consortium) smoking initiation effective-N = 1 220 901, alcohol drinks per week – N = 941 280, cigarettes per day – N = 337 334 European Lambert et al. (2013) effective-N = 46 670; Kunkle et al. (2019) effective-N = 57 692; Huang et al. (2017) – N = 40 255 European LD r2 < 0.001 Yes, LD r2 ⩾ 0.8 FDR
60 Larsson et al. (2017) Thorgeirsson et al. (2010) (TAG consortium) smoking initiation effective-N = 72 710, cigarettes per day N = 38 181, smoking cessation effective-N = 41 278;. Jorgenson et al. (2017), N = 71 071; Cornelis et al. (2015), N = 91 462 European Lambert et al. (2013) effective-N = 46 668 European LD r2 < 0.2 Yes, LD r2 > 0.9 Bonferroni (0.05/24 test = 0.002), <0.05 was reported as ‘suggestive evidence’)
61 Wootton et al. (2020) Abdellaoui et al. (2019) – N = 511 280; Liu et al. (2019a, 2019b) (GSCAN consortium) without UKB and without 23 and me smoking initiation effective-N = 244 920, alcohol drinks per week – N = 226 223; Walters et al. (2018) effective-N = 34 780 European Abdellaoui et al. (2019) – N = 511 280; Liu et al. (2019a, 2019b) (GSCAN consortium) without UKB and without 23andme smoking initiation effective-N = 244 920, cigarettes per day – N = 249 171, smoking cessation effective-N = 142 612, alcohol drinks per week – N = 226 223; Walters et al. (2018) effective-N = 34 780 European Independent SNPs as reported in exposure GWAS were selected; for instruments at threshold p < 1 × 10−5, LD r2 < 0.01 Yes, LD r2 ≥ 0.8 None
62 Lim et al. (2020) Stringer et al. (2016) (International Cannabis Consortium) effective-N = 31 933; Walters et al. (2018), effective-N = 34 780 European UKB – N = 125 742 European LD r2 < 0.001 No None
63 Treur et al. (2019) Liu et al. (2019a) (GSCAN consortium) smoking initiation effective-N = 1 220 901, alcohol drinks per week – N = 941 280; Sanchez-Roige et al. (2019) – N = 121 604; Walters et al. (2018) effective-N = 34 779; Pasman et al. (2018) (International Cannabis Consortium) effective-N = 180 934; Demontis et al. (2019) effective-N = 49 017; Cornelis et al. (2016) – N = 91 462 European Liu et al. (2019a) (GSCAN consortium) excluding 23andme smoking initiation effective-N = 632 783, cigarettes per day – N = 263 954, smoking cessation – N = 312 821, alcohol drinks per week – N = 537 341; Sanchez-Roige et al. (2019) – N = 121 604; Walters et al. (2018) effective-N = 34 779; Pasman et al. (2018) (International Cannabis Consortium) effective-N = 180 934; Demontis et al. (2019) – N = 15 548 (only adults included); Cornelis et al. (2016) – N = 91 462 European Independent SNPs as reported in exposure GWAS were selected No None (note the authors explain how they define strength of evidence)
a

Pre-print publication (not peer-reviewed) obtained from bioRxiv.org, medRxiv.org or arXiv.org.

Note that the complete references to the samples listed under ‘GWAS sample exposure variable(s)’ and ‘GWAS sample outcome variable(s)’ can be found in the original publications (1–63).