Table 3.
Associations between incident AF and (overall, and restricted to women with mean exposures , , and ) and among women enrolled in the Danish Nurse Cohort in 1993 or 1999 and followed through 2014.
| n (cases) | Model 1a | Model 2b | Model 2b | Model 2b | Model 2b | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) | HR (95% CI) | HR (95% CI) | HR (95% CI) | HR (95% CI) | ||
| 1-y mean | ||||||
| per | 23,528 (1,522) | 1.03 (0.97, 1.08) | 1.00 (0.94, 1.06) | 0.90 (0.82, 0.98) | —c | 0.96 (0.89, 1.04) |
| per | 23,528 (1,522) | 1.06 (0.98, 1.14) | 1.05 (0.96, 1.13) | —c | 1.10 (0.98, 1.22) | 1.03 (0.94, 1.12) |
| 17,974 (262) | 1.01 (0.56, 1.83) | 0.99 (0.55, 1.79) | —c | —c | 0.98 (0.53, 1.82) | |
| 23,202 (1,432) | 1.04 (0.94, 1.14) | 1.03 (0.93, 1.13) | —c | —c | 1.01 (0.91, 1.12) | |
| 23,503 (1,515) | 1.05 (0.97, 1.15) | 1.04 (0.96, 1.14) | —c | —c | 1.03 (0.93, 1.13) | |
| 3-y mean | ||||||
| per | 23,528 (1,522) | 1.03 (0.98, 1.08) | 1.00 (0.95, 1.06) | 0.86 (0.78, 0.95) | —c | 0.97 (0.90, 1.04) |
| per | 23,528 (1,522) | 1.11 (1.01, 1.20) | 1.09 (1.00, 1.20) | —c | 1.21 (1.06, 1.39) | 1.08 (0.97, 1.19) |
| 15,147 (99) | 0.91 (0.32, 2.62) | 0.89 (0.31, 2.58) | —c | —c | 0.84 (0.28, 2.52) | |
| 23,043 (1,416) | 1.13 (1.01, 1.27) | 1.11 (0.99, 1.25) | —c | —c | 1.10 (0.97, 1.24) | |
| 23,489 (1,516) | 1.12 (1.01, 1.24) | 1.10 (1.00, 1.22) | —c | —c | 1.09 (0.97, 1.22) | |
| 23-y mean | ||||||
| per | 23,528 (1,522) | 1.01 (0.96, 1.06) | 0.98 (0.93, 1.04) | —c | —c | 0.96 (0.90, 1.04) |
Note: Estimates are based on IQR increments: (), , (), and (10 dB). AF, atrial fibrillation; CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; IQR, interquartile range; , nnual mean 24-h road traffic noise levels; , itrogen dioxide; , articulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of .
Model 1, adjusted for age (underlying time) and year of cohort entry (1993/1999).
Model 2, , consumption of fruit, alcohol consumption, physical activity, marital status, degree of urbanization, and calendar year.
—, 23 mean of not available.