Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Aug 2.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2020 Jul 4;130(2):125–132. doi: 10.1177/0003489420938820

Table 2.

Agreement between scheduled home video and in-office evaluation of same rater

Variable Number of videos on which both methods agree Number of videos on which methods disagree Cohen’s kappa P-value

Cerumen 37 (84%) 7 (16%) NA -
Tube patent 30 (68%) 14 (32%) 0.48 <0.0001
Tube in place 34 (77%) 10 (23%) 0.54 <0.0001
Unable to visualize TM 38 (86%) 6 (14%) NA -
Tube extruding 36 (82%) 8 (18%) 0.58 <0.0001
Tube blocked 37 (84%) 7 (16%) 0.24 0.0077
Tube extruded 39 (89%) 5 (11%) 0.41 <0.0001
Acute OM with effusion 44 (100%) 0 (0%) - -
Middle ear effusion 42 (95%) 2 (4%) NA -
Ear drum retraction 44 (100%) 0 (0%) NA -
Ottorhea/drainage present 43 (98%) 1 (2%) NA -
Granulation tissue present 44 (100%) 0 (0%) NA -
*

Calculated for variables with 4 or more disagreements, where possible