Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 29;43(4):343–350. doi: 10.1177/02537176211024537

Table 3.

Effect of Telecounseling (vs. General Education) on the Psychological Parameters of the Participants (Per Protocol)

  Within-Subject Diff. (Time-Effect): t (Mean Diff.) (95%CI) P-Value Between Subject Diff. (Group Effect): t (Mean Diff.) (95%CI) P-Value Group*Time Interaction: t (Mean Diff.) (95%CI) P-Value
Depression scores 2
Fixed effect
Baseline (ref.)
EOS
W2
W4
Random effect
Intercept (variance [σ²]) (SE)
Residual effect

–2.04 (–8.7, –0.03)
–2.12 (–8.8, –0.2)
–4.14 (–16.2, –5.6)
0.048*
0.040*
<0.001*

–1.56 (8.4, 15.2)
0.126
–0.62 (–8.3, 4.4)
–0.42 (–8.3, 5.5)
–1.48 (–1.9, 12.2)
σ² = 10.09
σ² = 17.99
0.54
0.68
0.15
0.08
<0.001*
Anxiety score
Fixed effect
Baseline
EOS
W2
W4
Random effect
Intercept (variance [σ²]) (SE)
Residual effect

–2.77 (–8.0, –1.2)
–1.61 (–6.1, –0.6)
–3.50 (–11.5, –3.2)
0.009*
0.115
0.001*

–0.163 (–3.8, 2.9)
0.872
–0.87 (–7.1, 2.8)
–1.39 (–9.1, 1.7)
0.19 (–4.9, 5.9)
σ² = 3.79
σ² = 11.7
0.39
0.17
0.84
0.177
<0.001*
Stress score
Fixed effect
Baseline
EOS
W2
W4
Random effect
Intercept (variance [σ²]) (SE)
Residual effect

–4.04 (–9.5, –3.1)
–3.08 (–8.0, –1.6)
–5.24 (–14.1, –6.3)
<0.001*
0.004*
<0.001*

–1.21 (–7.1, 1.8)
0.23
–1.14 (–7.3, 2.0)
–0.79 (–7.1, 3.1)
0.50 (–3.8, 6.4)
σ² = 13.04
σ² = 09.49
0.25
0.43

0.025
<0.001*
IES-R score
Fixed effect
Baseline
EOS
W2
W4
Random effect
Intercept
Residual effect

–3.89 (–17.5, –5.5)
–4.71 (–19.9, –7.9)
–4.36 (–23.4, –8.5)
<0.001*
<0.001*
<0.001*

–2.16 (–13.9, –0.4)
0.036*
0.68 (–5.8, 11.7)
0.79 (–5.8, 13.3)
1.09 (–4.4, 14.7)
σ² = 18.22
σ² = 34.25
0.28
0.43
0.29
0.119
<0.001*

1 reference is the control group. 2 DASS21, 2 random effect of the subjects (participants)

- Baseline is the reference category, - control group is the reference category, -c control group*baseline interaction is the reference category, SE: Standard error