Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Oct 9.
Published in final edited form as: J AAPOS. 2020 Oct 9;24(5):282.e1–282.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2020.06.009

Table 3.

Mean improvement at 8 weeks

AE BCVA, logMARa RDS, log arcseca Extent of suppression scotoma, log degreesa Depth of suppression, CBIa
Total (N = 63) 0.14 ± 0.08b 0.16 ± 0.39b 0.19 ± 0.49b 0.61 ± 3.07b
Contrast increment protocol
 10% (n = 17) 0.14 ± 0.07b 0.14 ± 0.30 0.19 ± 0.46 0.79 ± 3.39
 5% (n = 16) 0.14 ± 0.09b 0.12 ± 0.45 0.15 ± 0.38 0.65 ± 3.06
 0% (n = 14) 0.13 ± 0.09b 0.16 ± 0.32 0.24 ± 0.64b −0.76 ± 3.17
 10% + reset (n = 16) 0.16 ± 0.09b 0.22 ± 0.49 0.18 ± 0.35 1.49 ± 2.49b
Age group
 4.0–7.4 years 0.17 ± 0.08b 0.19 ± 0.43 0.23 ± 0.38b 0.43 ± 3.05b
 7.5–10.9 years 0.12 ± 0.08b 0.13 ± 0.37 0.15 ± 0.57b 0.75 ± 3.09

AE BCVA, amblyopic eye best-corrected visual acuity; CBI, contrast balance index; logMAR, logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution; RDS, random dot stereoacuity.

a

Results presented as mean and standard deviation.

b

Significant improvement from baseline.