Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 2;5(8):e617. doi: 10.1097/HS9.0000000000000617

Table 2.

Response Rates by Treatment Arm: Primary and Final Analyses

Primary Analysis Final Analysis
P+LDAC (n = 125) V+LDAC (n = 246) P+LDAC (n = 222) V+LDAC (n = 444)
Patients who achieved CR, n (%) 12 (9.6) 23 (9.3) 27 (12.2) 67 (15.1)
Patients who achieved CRi, n (%) 9 (7.2) 39 (15.9) 11 (5.0) 56 (12.6)
Patients who achieved CR or CRi, n (%) 21 (16.8) 62 (25.2) 38 (17.1) 123 (27.7)
 95% CIa 11.26–24.32 20.19–30.98 12.73–22.62 23.74–32.04
 OR V+LDAC vs P+LDACb 1.66 1.88
 95% CI 0.95–2.89 1.24–2.83
P 0.071 0.002
No response assessment/not evaluable for response, n (%) 16 (12.8) 95 (38.6) 39 (17.6) 158 (35.6)
Death ≤28 d after randomization, n (%) 4 (3.2) 27 (11.0) 8 (3.6) 52 (11.7)
Death >28 and ≤56 d after randomization, n (%) 7 (5.6) 30 (12.2) 16 (7.2) 50 (11.3)
Death >56 and ≤84 d after randomization, n (%) 0 8 (3.3) 2 (0.9) 18 (4.1)
Median OS, mo (95% CI) 6.5 (5.1–8.1) 4.8 (3.8–6.4) 6.5 (4.9–8.0) 5.6 (4.5–6.8)
 HR V+LDAC vs P+LDAC 1.26 0.97
 95% CI (0.9–1.7) (0.8–1.2)
P 0.11 0.76
Median EFS, mo (95% CI) 3.1 (2.1–5.8) 2.8 (2.3–3.8) 2.8 (2.1–4.9) 3.3 (2.6–4.2)
 HR V+LDAC vs P+LDAC 1.18 0.96
 95% CI (0.9, 1.6) (0.8, 1.2)
P 0.26 0.67
Median RFS, mo (95% CI) NE (3.7–NE) 4.9 (3.6–13.4) 18.7 (11.3–NE) 13.1 (6.2–NE)
 HR V+LDAC vs P+LDAC 1.26 1.37
 95% CI (0.4–4.1) (0.7–2.7)

aWilson’s CI.

bOdds ratio derived from a Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel test stratified by baseline ECOG PS and type of AML. OR > 1 favors V+LDAC.

CI = confidence interval; CR = complete remission; CRi = complete remission with incomplete blood count recovery; EFS = event-free survival; HR = hazard ratio; NE = nonevaluable; OR = odds ratio; OS = overall survival; P+LDAC = placebo plus low-dose cytarabine; RFS = relapse-free survival; V+LDAC = volasertib plus low-dose cytarabine.