Table 5.
The results of the cluster-based statistics for all comparisons: the temporal extension of the respective observed cluster (in ms) as well as its p-value evaluated by the permutation test.
| Experiment 1 | Experiment 2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comparison | Cluster polarity | logicians (N = 33) | weak pragmatists (N = 9) | weak pragmatists (N = 15) |
| Table unprimed vs. Subset | Negative | 214–1,000, p < 0.0001 | 224–100, p = 0.0032 | 186–1,000, p < 0.0001 |
| Table unprimed vs. Fullset | Negative | 150–1,000, p < 0.0001 | 186–100, p < 0.0001 | 186–1,000, p < 0.0001 |
| Table fullset vs. Subset | Negative | – | [668–756, p = 0.068]; 784–944, p = 0.04 | – |
| Game unprimed vs. Subset | Negative | 266–1000, p < 0.0001 | 250–1,000, p < 0.0001 | 222–1,000, p < 0.0001 |
| Game unprimed vs. Fullset | Negative | 204–1,000, p < 0.0001 | 244–636, p = 0.0046 | 222–946, p < 0.0002 |
| Game subset vs. Fullset | Negative | 344–662, p = 0.0038 | – | – |
| positive | – | 650–800, p = 0.025 | [596–736, p = 0.069] | |
| Subset game vs. Table | Negative | 372–582, p = 0.0095 | 374–540, p = 0.0135 | – |
| Fullset game vs. Table | Negative | – | [270–368, p = 0.08]; 858–100, p = 0.0559 | 612–804, p = 0.0074 |
| Unprimed game vs. Table | Neg/pos | – | – | – |
Given that the weak pragmatists groups are relatively small, also marginally significant clusters are reported (0.5 < α <0.1) in []. No extra rows are added in those cases where no significant positive clusters were found.