Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 26;2021:5558590. doi: 10.1155/2021/5558590

Table 2.

Risk of bias for the 19 included studies using a modified approach to the Cochrane risk of bias tool.

Risk of bias Trial characteristics
Source Random sequence generation Allocation concealment Blinding of participants and personnel Blinding of outcome assessors Infrequent loss to follow-up Free of selective outcome reporting Free of other types of bias Statistical analysis (per protocol, intention to treat, etc.) How is loss to follow-up handled? Adverse event
Wang (2018) [10] Definitely yes Definitely yes Probably no Probably no Definitely no Definitely no Definitely no Not mentioned Ignored Yes

Wang (2016) [11] Probably yes Probably yes Probably no Probably no Definitely yes Definitely yes Probably yes Not mentioned Not mentioned Yes

Zhong (2016) [12] Definitely yes Definitely yes Probably no Probably no Definitely yes Definitely no Probably yes Per protocol Not mentioned No

Mi (2010) [13] Definitely yes Definitely yes Probably no Probably no Definitely yes Definitely yes Probably yes Not mentioned Not mentioned Yes

Bai (2019) [14] Definitely yes Definitely yes Probably no Probably no Definitely yes Definitely yes Probably yes Not mentioned Not mentioned Yes

Liu (2018) [15] Definitely yes Definitely yes Probably no Probably no Definitely no Definitely yes Probably yes Not mentioned Ignored Yes

Liu (2011) [16] Definitely yes Definitely yes Probably no Probably no Definitely yes Definitely yes Probably yes Not mentioned Not mentioned Yes

Fu (2019) [17] Definitely yes Definitely yes Probably no Probably no Definitely no Definitely no Definitely no Per protocol Ignored Yes

Wu (2019) [18] Definitely yes Definitely yes Probably no Probably no Definitely yes Definitely no Probably yes Not mentioned Not mentioned Yes

Dong (2018) [19] Probably yes Probably yes Probably no Probably no Definitely yes Definitely yes Probably yes Not mentioned Not mentioned Yes

Sun (2016) [20] Probably yes Probably yes Probably no Probably no Definitely yes Definitely yes Probably yes Not mentioned Not mentioned Yes

Zhang (2014) [21] Probably yes Probably yes Probably no Probably no Definitely yes Definitely yes Probably yes Per protocol Not mentioned Yes

Hui (2019) [22] Definitely yes Definitely yes Probably no Probably no Definitely yes Definitely yes Probably yes Not mentioned Not mentioned Yes

Tan (2012) [23] Probably yes Probably yes Probably no Probably no Definitely yes Definitely no Probably yes Not mentioned Not mentioned Yes

Fan (2017) [24] Definitely yes Definitely yes Probably no Probably no Definitely yes Definitely yes Probably yes Per protocol Not mentioned No

Jiang (2016) [25] Probably yes Probably yes Probably no Probably no Definitely yes Definitely no Probably yes Per protocol Not mentioned No

Li (2017) [26] Probably yes Probably yes Probably no Probably no Definitely yes Definitely yes Probably yes Not mentioned Not mentioned Yes

Huang (2018) [27] Probably yes Probably yes Probably no Probably no Definitely yes Definitely yes Probably yes Not mentioned Not mentioned No

Peng (2012) [28] Probably yes Probably yes Probably no Probably no Definitely yes Definitely yes Probably yes Per protocol Not mentioned No