Table 2.
Fit indices for models of the structure of phonological awareness tasks
| Model | B-S X2 | df | CFI | RMSEA | B-S X2 difference with Model 1F | AIC | BIC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1F | 6.916 | 5 | .998 | .020 | – | 25.443 | 59.009 |
| 2FO:AxS | 6.593 | 4 | .995 | .041 | .322, p = 0.570 | 27.392 | 64.314 |
| 2FO:PxSP | 1.188 | 4 | > .999 | < .001 | 5.727, p = 0.017 | 22.749 | 23.393 |
| 2FOrt:AxS | 22.458* | 6a | .445 | .349 | – | 177.946 | 208.155 |
| 2FOrt:PxSP | 13.002* | 6a | .975 | .074 | – | 31.013 | 61.222 |
B-S X2 Bollen-Stine bootstrapped X2, df degrees of freedom, CFI Comparative Fit Index, RMSEA root mean square error of approximation, AIC Akaike information criterion, BIC Bayesian information criterion
*p < .05
aIt was necessary to impose an additional restriction on the model, so that it could be identified