Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 2;11:15606. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-95201-5

Table 3.

Renal function, eGFR (linear mixed model).

Model-based estimates
Mean eGFR Lower 95% confidence limit Upper 95% confidence limit p-value
ESP transplantation Yes vs. no −5.73 −12.23 0.77 0.084
Age at RTx x vs. x − 1 years −0.36 −0.46 −0.26  < 0.001
Effect of metabolism group combined over all time points Fast vs. slow −7.5 −10.6 −4.3  < 0.001
Effect of time combined over both metabolism groups  < 0.001
Interaction term of ER-Tac metabolism groups × time points 0.037
Least square estimates of the mean difference between fast and slow metabolizer at different time points (combination of main and interaction effects of tacrolimus metabolism group and time points)
At 3 months Fast vs. slow −7.62 −10.70 −4.55  < 0.001
At 6 months Fast vs. slow −6.98 −10.55 −3.42  < 0.001
At 12 months Fast vs. slow −8.51 −11.85 −5.18  < 0.001
At 24 months Fast vs. slow −8.22 −11.69 −4.75  < 0.001
At 36 months Fast vs. slow −9.04 −12.83 −5.25  < 0.001
At 48 months Fast vs. slow −7.07 −11.20 −2.95  < 0.001
At 60 months Fast vs. slow −4.80 −9.03 −0.56 0.027
Least square estimates of the mean change between the time points for each metabolism group (combination of main and interaction effects of tacrolimus metabolism group and time points)
Fast metabolizer 6 vs. 3 months 5.18 3.22 7.13  < 0.001
12 vs. 3 months 4.08 2.11 6.05  < 0.001
24 vs. 3 months 2.92 0.76 5.09 0.008
36 vs. 3 months 2.16 −0.27 4.60 0.082
48 vs. 3 months 2.45 −0.49 5.40 0.103
60 vs. 3 months 3.87 0.84 6.89 0.012
Slow metabolizer 6 vs. 3 months 4.54 3.09 5.98  < 0.001
12 vs. 3 months 4.97 3.57 6.37  < 0.001
24 vs. 3 months 3.52 1.86 5.18  < 0.001
36 vs. 3 months 3.58 1.55 5.60  < 0.001
48 vs. 3 months 1.90 −0.24 4.04 0.082
60 vs. 3 months 1.04 −1.26 3..33 0.375

Results of the linear mixed model. Selected parameter estimates and least square means for estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (mL/min/1.73 m2) are shown. P-values are from Wald tests. Repeated measurements for each patient were modelled using SAS PROC MIXED by fitting a marginal linear mixed model with an unstructured variance–covariance matrix for the residuals with patient as subject and the order given by time.

ESP European Senior Program, RTx renal transplantation.