Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 15;18(3):841–848. doi: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2020.0413

Table 3.

Efficacy assessment of the phase 2 study

Characteristics ORR (%) CR (%) SD (%) PD (%) Not evaluable (%)*
Phase 2 (n = 113) 68 (60.2) 46 (40.7) 11 (9.7) 30 (26.5) 4 (3.5)
IPI
 0–1 (n = 34) 23 (67.6) 18 (52.9) 3 (8.8) 7 (20.6) 1 (2.9)
 2 (n = 33) 20 (60.6) 13 (39.4) 6 (18.2) 7 (21.2) 0 (0)
 3 (n = 24) 14 (58.3) 7 (29.2) 1 (4.2) 8 (33.3) 1 (4.2)
 4–5 (n = 22) 11 (50.0) 8 (36.4) 1 (4.5) 9 (40.9) 2 (9.1)
Pathology subtypes
 AITL (n = 41) 27 (65.9) 17 (41.5) 4 (9.8) 8 (19.5) 2 (4.9)
 PTCL-NOS (n = 48) 26 (54.2) 20 (41.7) 5 (10.4) 16 (33.3) 1 (2.1)
 ALCL (ALK-) (n = 17) 13 (76.5) 8 (47.1) 2 (2.8) 2 (2.8) 0 (0)
 EATL (n = 7) 2 (28.6) 1 (14.3) 0 (0) 4 (57.1) 1 (14.3)

*Patients without efficacy assessments due to premature discontinuation by AEs.

ORR, overall response rate; CR, complete response; SD, stable disease; PD, progressive disease; IPI, international prognostic index; AITL, angioimmunoblastic T cell lymphoma; PTCL-NOS, peripheral T cell lymphoma-not otherwise specified; ALCL, anaplastic large cell lymphoma; EATL, enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma; AE, adverse event.