Sr no |
|
Not at all written (0) |
Does not meet expectations (1) |
Approaching expectations (2) |
Meet expectations (3) |
Exceeds expectations (4) |
1 |
Title appropriate; not lengthy, study design and place mentioned |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
Introduction includes key concepts and relevant background information. |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
Literature review (comprehensive and clear) |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
Rationale and relevance (finer criteria) |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
Hypothesis |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
Research question (specific, researchable questions that have the potential to add to the current body of knowledge (PICOT) |
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
Objective (SMART) |
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
Sufficient detail to determine that methodology is sound (quality, the validity of data is maintained) |
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
Sufficient detail to carry out the experiment or replication, including subject, setting, procedure, etc. |
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
Appropriate study design is chosen with details mentioned |
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
Specific independent and dependent variables are appropriate to the objective |
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
Quantitative components are appropriately added |
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
Detailed framework of data analysis |
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
Dummy tables address the objective |
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
Ethical consideration mentioned |
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
Gnatt chart |
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
Citation done by referencing manager |
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
References (one or other style) by manager |
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
Questionnaire / schedule (variety of questions added ) |
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
Logical flow of question |
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
Questions framed in a correct manner |
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
Absence of ambiguous questions |
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
Appropriate in length and relevant to the objective |
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
Overall writing skill and clarity |
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
Grammar, punctuation, and spelling |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total marks |
|
|
|
|
|