Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 4;13(7):e16176. doi: 10.7759/cureus.16176

Table 3. Rubric for protocol .

PICOT: patient/problem, intervention, comparison, outcome, time; SMART: specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, time-bound

Sr no   Not at all written (0) Does not meet expectations (1) Approaching expectations (2) Meet expectations (3) Exceeds expectations (4)
1 Title appropriate; not lengthy, study design and place mentioned          
2 Introduction includes key concepts and relevant background information.          
3 Literature review (comprehensive and clear)          
4 Rationale and relevance (finer criteria)          
5 Hypothesis          
6 Research question (specific, researchable questions that have the potential to add to the current body of knowledge (PICOT)          
7 Objective (SMART)          
8 Sufficient detail to determine that methodology is sound (quality, the validity of data is maintained)          
9 Sufficient detail to carry out the experiment or replication, including subject, setting, procedure, etc.          
10 Appropriate study design is chosen with details mentioned          
11 Specific independent and dependent variables are appropriate to the objective          
12 Quantitative components are appropriately added          
13 Detailed framework of data analysis          
14 Dummy tables address the objective          
15 Ethical consideration mentioned          
16 Gnatt chart          
17 Citation done by referencing manager          
18 References (one or other style) by manager          
19 Questionnaire / schedule (variety of questions added )          
20 Logical flow of question          
21 Questions framed in a correct manner          
22 Absence of ambiguous questions          
23 Appropriate in length and relevant to the objective          
24 Overall writing skill and clarity          
25 Grammar, punctuation, and spelling          
  Total marks