Table 3.

The analysis of deviance table (Type II) for the binomial GLMM shows that the effect of pair formation on the correct assignment of calls to individuals, was call type specific. Significant (highest-order) effects are indicated with p-values in bold.

Response: correctly classified calls
	Chi2	df	p
Condition [(bpf) vs. (apf)]	7.36	1	0.007
Call type	26.03	2	2.224e−06
Condition × call type	63.58	2	1.559e−14

pseudo-R² = 0.25, N_observations = 106 on N_Individuals = 20,in N_Pairs = 10; N_{Call types} = 3.