Table 1.

Comparative measurements of Thelohanellus caudatus syn. T. habibpuri and T. avijiti described from the fin of rohu, Labeo rohita.

Data given by	Length of the spore	Width of the spore	Thickness of the spore	Length of the polar capsule.	Width of the polar capsule.
T. caudatusPagarkar and Das 1993	13.8 ± 0.37 13-14	9 ± 0.16 8.5–9.5	–	7.02 ± 0.11 7–7.5	5.07 ± 0.1813.9
T. caudatus byMondal et al. (2014)	15.41 14.8–16.6	10.33 9.2–12.9		6.99 6.2–8.3	5.32 6.2–8.3
Present data	13,7 ± 0,93 (12,3–14,6)	9 ± 0.82 (8–10)	6,8 ± 0,41 (6,2–7,3)	6,5 ± 0,4 (6,2–6,9)	4,7 ± 0,47 (4,2–5)
T. habibpuriAcharia and Dutta, 2007	13.8 ± 0.53 (13–14.3)	8.5 ± 0.036 (8–9)		6 ± 0.025 (6–6.5)	4.9 ± 0.062 (4.1–5)
T. avijiti Basu and Haldar, 2003	14 (13.0–14.7)	9.7 (9.1–10.2		6.0 (5.6–6.4)	4.0 (3.8–4.2)