Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 9;1(3-4):100025. doi: 10.1016/j.infpip.2019.100025

Table 3.

Tracking.

Items Non government teaching
Government teaching
Government non-teaching
Non-government non teaching
Corporate non-teaching
Overall
TR
TR
TR
TR
TR
TR Yes No
(Yes %) (No %) (Yes %) (No %) (Yes %) (No %) (Yes %) (No %) (Yes %) (No %)
Tracking -Process measures
“Does your stewardship program monitor adherence to a documentation policy (dose, duration, and indication)?” 20 (85%) (15%) 7 (43%) (57%) 8 (50%) (50%) 5 (0%) (100%) 4 (25%) (75%) 44 57% 43%
“Does your stewardship program monitor adherence to facility-specific treatment recommendations?” 20 (75%) (25%) 7 (57%) (43%) 8 (38%) (63%) 5 (0%) (100%) 4 (0%) (100%) 44 55% 45%
“Does your stewardship program monitor compliance with one of more of the specific interventions in place?” 20 (80%) (20%) 7 (29%) (71%) 8 (25%) (75%) 5 (0%) (100%) 4 (0%) (100%) 44 45% 55%
Tracking -Outcome measures
“Does your facility track rates of C. diffiile infection?” 20 (80%) (20%) 7 (0%) (100%) 8 (25%) (75%) 5 (0%) (100%) 4 (0%) (100%) 44 41% 59%
“Does your facility produce an antibiotic (cumulative antibiotic susceptibility report?” 20 (85%) (15%) 7 (0%) (100%) 8 (25%) (75%) 5 (0%) (100%) 4 (0%) (100%) 44 36% 64%
Tracking -Monitor antibiotic use by metrics
“By counts of antibiotic(s) administered to patients per day (Days of Therapy; DOT)?” 20 (95%) (5%) 7 (57%) (43%) 8 (50%) (50%) 5 (20%) (80%) 4 (25%) (75%) 44 66% 34%
“By number of grams of antibiotics used (Defied Daily Dose, DDD)?” 20 (75%) (25%) 7 (43%) (57%) 8 (63%) (38%) 5 (0%) (100%) 4 (0%) (100%) 44 52% 48%
“By direct expenditure for antibiotics (purchasing costs)?” 20 (60%) (40%) 7 (0%) (100%) 8 (25%) (75%) 5 (20%) (80%) 4 (50%) (50%) 44 39% 61%