Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 12;37(Suppl 1):i477–i483. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab264

Table 2.

Performance comparison between Sigmap and Uncalled on yeast genome

Dataset Method Correctly mapped reads (%) TP FP FN Precision (%) Recall (%) F1-score Mean time per read (ms)
D1 Sigmap 97.66 29675 7 661 99.98 97.82 0.9889 59
Uncalled 97.47 29615 722 47 97.62 99.84 0.9872 18.3
D2 Sigmap 87.54 81892 964 10683 98.84 88.46 0.9336 68.3
Uncalled 87.37 81725 1054 10765 98.73 88.36 0.9326 303.1

The best numbers are highlighted in bold.