Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 12;37(Suppl 1):i477–i483. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab264

Table 3.

Performance comparison between Sigmap and Uncalled on green algae genome

Dataset Method Correctly mapped reads (%) TP FP FN Precision (%) Recall (%) F1-score Mean time per read (ms)
D3 Sigmap 87.86 52989 1694 5628 96.90 90.40 0.9354 509.1
Sigmap (l3) 86.21 51998 1973 6338 96.34 89.14 0.9260 373
Sigmap (l4) 83.51 50370 2542 7397 95.20 87.20 0.9102 314.8
Sigmap (l5) 80.69 48669 3107 8532 94.00 85.08 0.8932 279.6
Sigmap (l6) 77.20 46564 3781 9962 92.49 82.38 0.8714 261.2
Uncalled 72.18 43534 883 15896 98.01 73.25 0.8384 677
Uncalled (mask) 76.37 46060 881 13372 98.12 77.50 0.8660 596.5

The best numbers are highlighted in bold.