. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Aug 4.

Published in final edited form as: Pattern Recognit. 2021 Jan 5;112:107810. doi: 10.1016/j.patcog.2020.107810

Table 8.

The performance of the developed network with or without the CCS sub-network on a total of 1,970 global field-of-view images from the MESSIDOR, ORIGIA, and REFUGE datasets using the mean and standard deviation (SD) of DSC, IOU, BAC, MCC, and Se.

Dataset	Method	DSC	IOU	BAC	MCC	Se
Dataset	Method	Mean±SD	Mean±SD	Mean±SD	Mean±SD	Mean±SD
MESSIDOR	with	0.9646±0.0234	0.9326±0.0416	0.9870±0.0123	0.9646±0.0227	0.9748±0.0249
MESSIDOR	Without	0.9592±0.0320	0.9233±0.0548	0.9868±0.0143	0.9594±0.0304	0.9745±0.0289
Dataset	Method	DSC	IOU	BAC	MCC	Se
Dataset	Method	Mean±SD	Mean±SD	Mean±SD	Mean±SD	Mean±SD
ORIGA	with	0.9392±0.0355	0.8873±0.0589	0.9938±0.0131	0.9401±0.0333	0.9895±0.0264
ORIGA	Without	0.9144±0.1044	0.8530±0.1140	0.9883±0.0583	0.9169±0.0980	0.9789±0.1169
Dataset	Method	DSC	IOU	BAC	MCC	Se
Dataset	Method	Mean±SD	Mean±SD	Mean±SD	Mean±SD	Mean±SD
REFUGE	with	0.9342±0.0458	0.8796±0.0729	0.9627±0.0246	0.9347±0.0434	0.9262±0.0495
REFUGE	Without	0.9304±0.0777	0.8767±0.0981	0.9647±0.0419	0.9313±0.0748	0.9305±0.0842