Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 21;1(3):100014. doi: 10.1016/j.crmeth.2021.100014

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Comparison of the C-I-TASSER results for the Pfam families and benchmark dataset for different C scores, Z scores, and Neff values

(A) Normalized Z score of the first LOMETS template versus the Neff of DeepMSA for the Pfam families (points) and benchmark dataset (background). The black crosses represent the Pfam targets with C ≥ −2.5, and the gray dots are Pfam targets with C < −2.5. The heatmap in the background depicts the TM scores for benchmark targets, where white regions indicate no data.

(B) The box-and-whisker chart for the logarithm Neff values of MSAs for easy and hard targets in the Pfam families and benchmark dataset. The left corresponds to the results of the benchmark dataset, and the right contains the results for the Pfam families. The yellow boxes indicate the hard targets, and the blue boxes are the easy targets.