Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Cancer Res. 2021 Apr 5;27(15):4245–4255. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-4450

Table 1:

Patient characteristics of the 3 study cohorts (SUVmax, RNAseq, and TMA). A substantial number of the patients in the RNAseq and TMA cohorts were also included in the SUVmax analysis. The p-values shown represent comparisons between patients included in both the RNAseq and SUVmax analysis versus patients included only in the SUVmax analysis to determine if the RNAseq subgroup was biasing the overall cohort (using the Fisher’s exact or Wilcoxon tests as appropriate). The same was done for the TMA subgroup.

SUV Cohort RNAseq Cohort p-value TMA Cohort p-value

All patients 318 68 (57 in SUV cohort) 82 (67 in SUV cohort)
Age at Diagnosis 0.42 0.94
 Median (Range) 50 (23–92) 53 (25–81) 52 (25–92)
FIGO Stage (%) 0.52 0.26
 I 125 (39.3 %) 20 (29.4%) 29 (35.4%)
 II 119 (37.4%) 25 (36.8%) 28 (34.1%)
 III 69 (21.7%) 21 (30.9%) 22 (26.8%)
 IV 5 (1.6%) 2 (2.9%) 3 (3.7%)
Lymph Node Involvement (%) 0.08 0.82
 None 146 (45.9%) 33 (48.5%) 40 (58.8%)
 Pelvic 122 (38.4%) 21 (30.9%) 27 (32.9%)
 Para-aortic/supraclavicular 50 (15.7%) 14 (20.6%) 15 (18.3%)
Histology 0.85 0.86
 Squamous 256 (80.5%) 55 (80.9%) 56 (80.5%)
 Non-squamous 62 (19.5%) 13 (19.1%) 16 (19.5%)
  Adenocarcinoma 42 (13.2%) 9 (13.2%) 10 (12.2%)
  Small cell 8 (2.5%) 2 (2.9%) 2 (2.4%)
  Adenosquamous 4 (1.3%) 2 (2.9%) 1 (1.2%)
  Other 8 (2.5%) 0 3 (3.7%)
SUVmax 0.65 0.19
 Mean (Range) 14.6 (2.9 – 60.3) 17.0 (3.4–53.6) 15.4 (3.77–60.3)