Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Dec 28.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Neurosci. 2021 Jun 28;24(8):1121–1131. doi: 10.1038/s41593-021-00878-6

Fig. 3. Decision but not selection accuracy is altered after SC inactivation.

Fig. 3

a Proportion correct (accuracy) in the delay and RT versions of the decision task is plotted for toIF trials (cyan) and awayIF trials (magenta) for 23 muscimol experiments in two monkeys, collapsed over coherence, before and after inactivation. Dark filled symbols show the mean accuracy from all experiments and less saturated colors show the accuracies of individual experiments. b Accuracy in the saccade selection task for the same experiments and monkeys. c Same as in b for the six saline injections in the two monkeys. d Mean peak saccadic velocity for the decision task before and after muscimol for toIF and awayIF decisions for 17 injections in two monkeys. Six datasets were excluded due to technical issues with the eye tracker that impacted measurement of eye speed but not assessment of choice or RT. e Same as in d for the saccade selection task. f Same as in d and e for the visually-guided saccade task used to measure saccadic velocity. There are fewer points in this plot because there were fewer saccades in this task that had the same vector target and saccade as in the decision and selection tasks. Note we also did not perform statistics with these data because of the fewer points. The data are useful for visual comparison. All statistics for accuracy and saccadic velocity appear in Supplementary Table 3.