Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 5;40(17):2484–2490. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.08.007

Table 1.

Sample characteristics of cross-sectional Australian samples collected in April 2020 (n = 1146) and November 2020 (n = 1941). Data are displayed as n (%) unless indicated otherwise.

Characteristic Level April
(n = 1146)
November
(n = 1941)
p-value
Age (years), mean (SD) 47.8 (18.3) 45.4 (16.9) <0.001
Age group <0.001
18 to 25 years 176 (15.4%) 273 (14.1%)
26 to 40 years 279 (24.3%) 606 (31.2%)
41 to 55 years 223 (19.5%) 474 (24.4%)
56 to 90 years 468 (40.8%) 588 (30.3%)
Gender 0.59
Male 576 (50.3%) 951 (49.0%)
Female 569 (49.7%) 986 (50.8%)
Prefer not to say 1 (0.1%) 4 (0.2%)
Education <0.001
High school or less 344 (30.0%) 670 (34.5%)
Certificate I-IV 232 (20.2%) 701 (36.1%)
University 570 (49.7%) 570 (29.4%)
Residential State / Territory 0.24
Australian Capital Territory 25 (2.2%) 44 (2.3%)
Northern Territory 12 (1.0%) 19 (1.0%)
Victoria 291 (25.4%) 490 (25.5%)
New South Wales 328 (28.6%) 610 (31.4%)
Queensland 223 (19.5%) 401 (20.7%)
Western Australia 150 (13.1%) 201 (10.4%)
South Australia 93 (8.1%) 131 (6.7%)
Tasmania 24 (2.1%) 45 (2.3%)
Socioeconomic status, mean IRSAD$ quintile, mean (SD) [1], [2], [3], [4], [5] 3.4 (1.4) 3.2 (1.4) 0.002
Adequate Health Literacy^ 918 (80.1%) 1620 (83.5%) 0.018
Belief not likely to get sick with COVID-19 (not at all) 205 (18.4%) 426 (22.7%) 0.005
Belief that vaccine efficacy is made up (agree) 327 (28.5%) 655 (33.7%) 0.003
Belief that the threat of COVID-19 is greatly exaggerated (agree) 231 (20.2%) 513 (26.4%) <0.001
Trust in institutions*, mean (SD) [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7] 5.57 (1.12) 5.41 (1.21) <0.001
Confidence in federal government, mean (SD) [1], [2], [3], [4] 2.88 (0.75) 2.88 (0.78) 0.72
Perceived public health threat, mean (SD) [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10] 7.34 (2.21) 6.21 (2.60) <0.001
COVID-19 vaccine willingness (unadjusted) <0.001
Disagree 82 (7.2%) 231 (11.9%)
Neither disagree or agree 186 (16.2%) 361 (18.6%)
Agree 878 (76.6%) 1349 (69.5%)
^

Assessed using the Single Item Literacy Screener, those responding ‘quite a bit/extremely’ were categorised as having adequate health literacy; ‘not at all/a little bit/somewhat’ as inadequate health literacy.

$

IRSAD: Index of Relative Socio-Economic Advantage and Disadvantage9; a quintile value of 1 represents most disadvantaged (least advantaged) and a quintile value of 5 represents most advantaged (least disadvantaged).

*

Institutional trust included scientists involved in developing and testing new ways to control COVID-19, researchers involved in tracking and predicting COVID-19 cases and medical institutions (GPs, hospitals) involved in managing COVID-19 cases.