Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul;13(7):4260–4270. doi: 10.21037/jtd-21-775

Figure 3.

Figure 3

CUSUM analyses for other complications. (A) For all 300 consecutive operations; (B,C,D) for the first 100 procedures of subgroups defined based on (B) tercile, (C) type of construct, (D) and hybrid versus non-hybrid procedures. Type of construct was subdivided into procedures including (I) SIMA +1 distal anastomosis, (II) SIMA +2 distal anastomoses, and (III) BIMA or more than 2 distal anastomoses. The red line represents the cumulative sum of complications, while the expected rate of complications and its 95% confidence boundaries are represented by the grey lines. CUSUM, cumulative sum; BIMA, bilateral internal mammary artery; SIMA, single internal mammary artery.