Table 6. Comparison with colposcopists.

Task	Model	Accuracy	Sensitivity	Specificity	PPV	NPV
NC vs. LSIL+	CAD	0.883 (0.841–0.917)	0.954 (0.904–0.983)	0.827 (0.762–0.881)	0.812 (0.742–0.871)	0.959 (0.912–0.985)
	Senior	0.857 (0.812–0.894)	0.924 (0.865–0.963)	0.803 (0.735–0.861)	0.787 (0.714–0.849)	0.931 (0.877–0.966)
	Junior	0.750 (0.697–0.798)	0.886 (0.819–0.935)	0.642 (0.565–0.715)	0.661 (0.586–0.730)	0.878 (0.807–0.930)
HSIL– vs. HSIL+	CAD	0.810 (0.761–0.853)	0.828 (0.732–0.900)	0.803 (0.743–0.854)	0.632 (0.536–0.720)	0.919 (0.870–0.954)
	Senior	0.833 (0.786–0.874)	0.448 (0.341–0.559)	0.991 (0.966–0.999)	0.951 (0.835–0.994)	0.814 (0.762–0.860)
	Junior	0.757 (0.704–0.804)	0.195 (0.118– 0.294)	0.986 (0.959–0.997)	0.850 (0.621–0.968)	0.750 (0.695–0.799)

Data were presented with 95% CIs. CAD, computer aided diagnosis; NC, normal cervix; LSIL, low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions; HSIL, high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value; CI, confidence interval.