Table 3.
The percentage score and rank of the JSANDS acceptability indicators.
| Simplicity indicators | Score, mean (SD) | Percentage score (%) | Rank |
| The JSANDSa data entry interface fields are easy to fill | 4.4 (0.9) | 87.2 | Excellent |
| The variables in the JSANDS data entry interface are easy to understand | 4.3 (0.9) | 86.5 | Excellent |
| Data entry in the JSANDS is time-consuming | 3.6 (1.5) | 71.2 | Good |
| Collecting detailed information of cases don’t require telephone contact or home visit | 3.4 (1.5) | 68.7 | Good |
| The case definitions (definition of stillbirth and neonatal death) used by JSANDS are easy to understand | 4.1 (1.0) | 82.1 | Excellent |
| The focal points don’t need continuous and frequent trainings to use the system | 3.3 (1.4) | 65.9 | Good |
| The sources of information on mortality and causes of deaths are easy to obtain | 3.9 (1.3) | 77.4 | Good |
| The JSANDS doesn’t require too much information to register neonatal death and stillbirths | 3.3 (1.5) | 65.5 | Good |
| Overall simplicity | 3.8 (1.3) | 75.4 | Good |
aJSANDS: Jordan Stillbirth and Neonatal Mortality Surveillance.