Table 3. Postoperative outcomes comparing CGCRYODERM versus DermACELL.
| CGCRYODERM (n=32) | DermACELL (n=32) | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall complication, n (%), [events] | 4 (12.50) [5] | 5 (15.63) [8] | 0.7055 |
| Major* complication, n (%), [events] | 4 (12.50) [5] | 4 (12.50) [7] | 1.0000 |
| Seroma, n (%) | 1 (3.13) | 2 (6.25) | 0.5637 |
| Major*, n (%) | 1 (3.13) | 2 (6.25) | 0.5637 |
| Infection, n (%) | 1 (3.13) | 4 (12.50) | 0.1797 |
| Major*, n (%) | 1 (3.13) | 3 (9.38) | 0.3173 |
| Hematoma, n (%) | 1 (3.13) | 1 (3.13) | 1.0000 |
| Major*, n (%) | 1 (3.13) | 1 (3.13) | 1.0000 |
| Mastectomy flap necrosis, n (%) | 2 (6.25) | 1 (3.13) | 0.3173 |
| Major*, n (%) | 2 (6.25) | 1 (3.13) | 0.3173 |
| Reconstructive failure, n (%) | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | – |
*, requiring unplanned readmission and/or reoperation after discharge for any complication.