Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 3;10(9):3. doi: 10.1167/tvst.10.9.3

Table 2.

Descriptive Statistics of RNFL Thickness in Each of Sector for Both Eyes Combined and Right and Left Eyes Separately

Both Eyes Right Eye Left Eye
First, Fifth First, Fifth First, Fifth
Sector Mean (SD) Centiles Mean (SD) Centiles Mean (SD) Centiles P Valuea
Global (µm) 100.0 (9.6) 78, 85 100.5 (9.7) 78, 85 100.3 (9.5) 78, 85 0.03
Temporal (µm) 71.0 (11.1) 45, 53 73.1 (11.6) 46, 54 68.9 (10.3) 45, 52 <0.001
Superotemporal (µm) 138.5 (18.3) 96, 108 140.6 (18.0) 99, 111 136.3 (18.3) 94, 106 <0.001
Superonasal (µm) 110.0 (21.6) 60, 74 104.9 (19.6) 59, 72 115.1 (22.3) 63, 78 <0.001
Nasal (µm) 79.4 (14.6) 45, 55 79.7 (14.7) 46, 55 79.1 (14.6) 45, 55 0.09
Inferonasal (µm) 110.6 (24.0) 55, 71 109.8 (24.1) 54, 70 111.5 (24.0) 56, 72 <0.001
Inferotemporal (µm) 143.4 (19.0) 100, 112 143.2 (18.8) 100, 112 143.6 (19.3) 99, 112 0.51
a

For test of the null hypothesis that RNFL thickness is the same in the right and left eyes calculated using linear mixed model with random intercepts to account for correlation between eyes. A Bonferroni correction was applied due to multiple testing and P < 0.007 is considered statistically significant. Data from all 1288 participants in the analysis were included.