Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 3;10(9):3. doi: 10.1167/tvst.10.9.3

Table 4.

Frequency Tables Comparing WNL, BL, and ONL RNFL Thickness Classifications in the Right and Left Eyes of Raine Study Participants

Left Eye Classification, n (%) Left Eye Classification, n (%)
All Sectors WNL BL ONL Total G WNL BL ONL Total
Right eye classification WNL 7809 (92.8) 224 (2.7) 41 (0.5) 8074 (95.9) Right eye classification WNL 1149 (95.8) 15 (1.3) 0 (0) 1164 (97.0)
BL 131 (1.6) 101 (1.2) 35 (0.4) 267 (3.2) BL 6 (0.5) 15 (1.3) 4 (0.3) 25 (2.1)
ONL 14 (0.2) 28 (0.3) 35 (0.4) 77 (0.9) ONL 0 (0) 1 (0.1) 10 (0.8) 11 (0.9)
Total 1954 (94.5) 353 (4.2) 111 (1.3) 8418 (100) Total 1155 (96.3) 31 (2.6) 14 (1.2) 1200 (100)
T WNL BL ONL Total TS WNL BL ONL Total
Right eye classification WNL 1008 (83.9) 92 (7.7) 10 (0.8) 1110 (92.4) Right eye classification WNL 1090 (90.5) 42 (3.5) 21 (1.7) 1153 (95.8)
BL 29 (2.4) 35 (2.9) 13 (1.0) 77 (3.1) BL 15 (1.2) 7 (0.6) 10 (0.8) 32 (1.3)
ONL 1 (0.1) 5 (0.4) 8 (0.7) 14 (0.6) ONL 5 (0.4) 7 (0.6) 7 (0.6) 19 (0.8)
Total 1038 (86.4) 132 (11.0) 31 (2.6) 1201 (100) Total 1110 (92.2) 56 (4.7) 38 (3.2) 1204 (100)
NS WNL BL ONL Total N WNL BL ONL Total
Right eye classification WNL 1177 (97.7) 6 (0.5) 1 (0.1) 1184 (98.3) Right eye classification WNL 1181 (98.3) 7 (0.6) 2 (0.2) 1190 (99.1)
BL 12 (1.0) 4 (0.3) 0 (0) 16 (0.6) BL 6 (0.5) 5 (0.4) 0 (0) 11 (0.4)
ONL 2 (0.2) 2 (0.2) 1 (0.1) 5 (0.2) ONL 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Total 1191 (98.8) 12 (1.0) 2 (0.2) 1205 (100) Total 1187 (98.8) 12 (1.0) 2 (0.2) 1201 (100)
NI WNL BL ONL Total TI WNL BL ONL Total
Right eye classification WNL 1149 (95.5) 16 (1.3) 0 (0) 1165 (96.8) Right eye classification WNL 1055 (87.6) 46 (3.8) 7 (0.6) 1108 (92.0)
BL 22 (1.8) 14 (1.2) 0 (0) 36 (1.4) BL 41 (3.4) 21 (1.7) 8 (0.7) 70 (2.8)
ONL 0 (0) 2 (0.2) 0 (0) 2 (0.1) ONL 6 (0.5) 11 (0.9) 9 (0.7) 26 (1.0)
Total 1171 (97.3) 31 (2.7) 0 (0) 1203 (100) Total 1102 (91.5) 78 (6.5) 24 (2.0) 1204 (100)

Data are shown for all sectors combined and individually for each RNFL sector. Percentages are calculated by dividing the number of occurrences by the grand total. All 1288 participants were included for this comparison.