Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Aug 5.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Behav Dev. 2016 Dec 2;42(1):143–147. doi: 10.1177/0165025416681537

Table 1.

Multiple regression models predicting purpose levels in adulthood from total adversity score and other predictor variables.

Model 1 Model 2

Predictor B (s.e.) (95% CI) β B (s.e.) (95% CI) β
Age −.12 (.14) (−0.39 – 0.15) −.02 −.12 (.14) (−0.39 – 0.15) −.02
Sex (0 – Female, 1 – Male) −.31 (.22) (−0.75 – 0.12) −.02 −.33 (.22) (−0.76 – 0.11) −.02
Race (0 – White, 1 – Nonwhite) −.14 (.45) (−1.01 – 0.74) .00 −.15 (.45) (−1.03 – 0.72) −.01
Marital Status (0 – Married, 1 – Unmarried) −1.86 (.24) (−2.34 – −1.38) −.12* −1.85 (.24) (−2.32 – −1.37) −.12*
Education 1.25 (.11) (1.03 – 1.47) .18* 1.25 (.11) (1.03 – 1.47) .18*
Retirement Status (0 – Working, 1 – Retired) −1.47 (.38) (−2.21– −0.73) −.07* −1.45 (.38) (−2.19– −0.71) −.07*
Total Adversity −0.68 (.11) (−0.90 – −0.46) −.09* −0.67 (.11) (−0.89 – −0.44) −.10*
Age × Adversity --- .19 (.12) (−0.05 – 0.42) .02

Adjusted Model R2 .07 .07

Note:

*

indicates p < .001. The change in R2 between a model with only the chosen covariates and Model 1 (one including total adversity) was .009. Total n = 3835.