Table 1.
Author | Year | Country | Study design | No. of patients | Histology | Staging (AJCC 7th) | Endpoints | Scanner | Lesion | FDG uptake time(min) | Image reconstruction method | Cutoff value | Determination of cutoff values |
Jung et al | 2017 | Korea | R | 131 | IDC+ILC+other | I, II, III | EFS | PET/CT | Primary tumor | 60 | Maximization algorithm | 5.5 | AUC |
Higuchi et al | 2017 | Japan | R | 387 | IDC+ILC+other | I, II, III | EFS | PET/CT | Primary tumor | 60 | 3.585 | AUC | |
Kitajima et al | 2016 | Japan | R | 196 | IDC+ILC+other | I, II, III | EFS | PET/CT | Primary tumor/node | 60 | 2.9/1.7 | AUC | |
Jo et al | 2015 | Korea | R | 508 | IDC | I, II, III | EFS | PET/CT | Primary tumor | 60 | Iterative reconstruction | 5.95 | AUC |
Vicente et al | 2015 | Spain | R | 198 | IDC+ILC | II,III | EFS/OS | PET/CT | Primary tumor/node | 60 | Iterative reconstruction | 6.05/2.25 | AUC |
Yue et al | 2015 | USA | R | 79 | IDC+ILC | I–IV | EFS | PET/CT | Primary tumor | 60 | Iterative reconstruction | 3.5 | AUC |
Kim et al | 2015 | Korea | R | 153 | IDC | II, III | EFS | PET/CT | Primary tumor/node | 60 | Iterative reconstruction algorithm | 11.1/2.2 | AUC |
Aogi et al | 2015 | Japan | R | 262 | IDC+ILC | I,II,III | EFS/OS | PET/CT | Primary tumor | 60–90 | Iterative reconstruction | 6.0 | AUC |
Baba et al | 2014 | Japan | R | 79 | IDC+ILC+other | I,II,III | EFS/OS | PET | Primary tumor | 60 | 4.16 | AUC | |
Cochet et al | 2014 | France | R | 142 | IDC+ILC | II,III,IV | EFS | PET/CT | Primary tumor | 60 | 5.7 | AUC | |
Ahn et al | 2013 | Korea | R | 496 | IDC+ILC+other | I,II,III | EFS | PET | Primary tumor | 60 | Iterative transmission algorithm | 4 | AUC |
Kadoya et al | 2013 | Japan | R | 344 | IDC+ILC+other | I,II,III | EFS | PET/CT | Primary tumor | 60–90 | Iterative algorithm | 3 | AUC |
Song et al | 2012 | Korea | R | 65 | IDC | II,III | EFS | PET/CT | Primary tumor/node | 60 | Maximum iterative reconstruction algorithm | 6.9/2.8 | AUC |