Table 4.
Associations between diet quality (2010-AHEIa) and body weight dissatisfaction in women aged 50–75 years
| Crudeb | Model 1b | Model 2b | Model 3b | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| β (95 % CI) | β (95 % CI) | β (95 % CI) | β (95 % CI) | |
| Body weight satisfaction | 0 (ref) | 0 (ref) | 0 (ref) | 0 (ref) |
| Dissatisfaction | −4·36* (-6·78, −1·93) | −4·52* (−6·97, −2·08) | −1·73 (−4–71, 1·24) | −1·66 (−4·68, 1·35) |
| Age (per 10 years increase) | 0·31 (−1·29, 1·91) | 0·54 (−1·05, 2·13) | 0·58 (−1·04, 2·19) | |
| Total energy intake (per 100 kcal/d increase) | −0·21 (−0·46, 0·05) | −0·21 (−0·47, 0·05) | −0·22 (−0·48, 0·04) | |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | −0·49* (−0·80, −0·19) | −0·44* (−0·75, −0·12) | ||
| Self-reported health status: Bad and very bad | 0 (ref) | |||
| Medium | −1·31 (−13·23, 10·62) | |||
| Good | 1·32 (−10·36, 13·01) | |||
| Very good | 0·43 (−11·41, 12·27) | |||
| Education: Secondary (apprenticeship) | 0 (ref) | |||
| Mandatory school | −4·68 (−9·90, 0·53) | |||
| Tertiary (university) | 0·02 (−2·57, 2·61) | |||
| Constant | 51·52* (50·00, 53·08) | 53·45* (42·11, 64·80) | 63·25* (50·49, 76·02) | 61·44 (42·95, 79·93) |
Values in bold indicate statistically significant results.
a
Modified Alternate Healthy Eating Index 2010.
bDifferences between dissatisfied and satisfied women were assessed using multiple linear regressions (*P < 0·05).