Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 2;8(4):ENEURO.0059-21.2021. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0059-21.2021

Table 1.

List of instrumental and neuronal parameters used in the different model configurations

Total
instrumental
capacitance
Access
resistance
Seal
resistance
Capacitance
neutralization
Bridge
balance
Morphologic
representation
Specific
membrane
capacitance
Internal
resistivity
Specific
membrane
resistivity
Maximal
Na+
conductance
Maximal
K+
conductance
Symbol (unit) Ctot (pF) Raccess
(MΩ)
Rseal (GΩ) CPN (pF) BB (MΩ) Cm
(μF/cm2)
Ri (Ω*cm) Rm (kΩ/cm2) gmaxNa
(mS/cm2)
gmaxK
(mS/cm2)
AP reconstitution/native AP
rediction (Figs. 4-6)
7.097 53.2 65.64 6.5/7/7.386 185 Detailed
anatomic
reconstruction
0.65 147.3 60.01 159.02/151.7/
160.03*1
5.83/5.41/
6.32*1
Correlations between signal
distortions and recording
conditions (Fig. 7)
6.74 1–200 50/5*2 6.8/
6.3
1–200 Single isopotential
compartment
(100 cm2/1000 cm2
surface area)
1 1e-9 50 150 40
Correlations between signal
distortions and axonal
morphology (Fig. 8)
6.74 60 50 6.8 60 Detailed
anatomic
reconstruction
1 150 50 300 15
Testing reliability of Ctot
estimation (Extended
Data Fig. 4-1B)
5.8–13.7 n/a.*3 50 n/a.*3 n/a.*3 n/a.*3 n/a.*3 n/a.*3 n/a.*3 n/a.*3 n/a.*3
Testing reliability of cellular
passive parameter and Raccess
prediction (Extended
Data Fig. 4-1C)
6.74 60 50 6.8 60 Axon-like realistic
morphology
(length = 300 μm, mean
diameter = 0.6 μm)
0.5–1.5 50–250 10–100 n/a. n/a.
Testing reliability of the prediction
of native AP shapes (Extended
Data Fig. 4-1D,E)
6.74 100 50 6.8 100 Single compartment
(length, diameter =
15 μm)
1 150 10 174*4 21*4

*1mean of the predicted maximal conductance densities for the reconstruction of APs recorded with CPN = 6.5, 7, and 7.386 pF.

*2for the small and for the larger cell, respectively.

*3not applicable in the simulated on-cell VC recording configuration.

*4median of the predicted maximal conductance densities for the reconstruction of APs generated with independent conductance mechanisms.