Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 5;12(8):770. doi: 10.1038/s41419-021-04045-4

Table 1.

Correlation between the proliferation, sXBP1 and ATF6 expression and peIF2α levels in CDG and CDDG cell lines treated with candidate and non-active control compounds.

Compounds NGLY1/− PMM2F119L/− DPAGT1+/−
Proliferation sXBP1 peIF2α ATF6 Proliferation sXBP1 peIF2αa ATF6a Proliferation sXBP1 peIF2α ATF6
Candidates Group I
1 ** ns ns ns ns ns
2 **** ns ns ns ns ns
3 ns **** *** ns **** *
4 ns **** ns ns ns **
5 ns * * ns ns ns
6 **** **** **** *** **** ** ns ns *** ** **** ****
9 *** **** **** * *** ** ns ns **** *** **** ****
Candidates Group II
14 ns **** ns ns ns ***
15 **** **** **** ** **** ** ns ns **** **** **** ****
16 *** ns ns ns ns ns
18 **** ns ns ns ns ns
25 ns **** **** ** **** ****
26 ns **** **** ** **** *** ns ns **** **** **** ***
Non-active controls
28 ns ns ns ns ns ns ns ns ns ns **** ns
29 ns ns ns ns ns ns
30 ns ns ns ns ns ns
31 ns ns ns ns ns ns
32 ns ns ns ns ns ns
33 ns ns ns ns ns ns
34 ns ns ns ns ns ns
35 ns ns ns ns ns ns
36 ns ns ns ns ns ns
37 ns ns ns ns ns ns
38 ns ns ns ns ns ns

aNo phenotype for these ER stress markers.

*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001.