Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul 31;39:101041. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101041

Table 7.

Relative Risk Ratio (RRR) of transitioning between disability states in the second Cognitive Function and Ageing Study (CFAS II) compared to CFAS I, by socioeconomic deprivation and number of multiple long-term conditions (MLTC), 95% confidence interval (CI) in parenthesis. Models stratified by sex, SES and MLTCs with study as a covariate. Step m = 6 months (see methods).

RRR (95% CI)
Sex Multiple Long Term Conditions Socioeconomic deprivation No disability to disability No disability to death Disability to no disability Disability to death
Men 0-1 health conditions Most affluent 0.6 (0.4–1.0) 0.5 (0.3–0.8) 2.1 (0.7–6.4) 1.3 (0.8–2.1)
Moderately affluent 0.7 (0.4–1.1) 0.6 (0.4–1.1) 1.0 (0.4–2.5) 0.9 (0.5–1.6)
Least affluent 0.5 (0.3–0.9) 0.7 (0.4–1.4) 0.6 (0.2–2.1) 0.7 (0.4–1.3)
2+ health conditions Most affluent 1.0 (0.7–1.5) 0.5 (0.3–0.8) 1.7 (0.8–3.4) 0.9 (0.7–1.2)
Moderately affluent 0.7 (0.4–1.0) 0.4 (0.2–0.8) 1.0 (0.5–2.0) 0.8 (0.6–1.0)
Least affluent 0.8 (0.5–1.2) 1.1 (0.5–2.3) 1.1 (0.5–2.2) 0.7 (0.5–0.9)
Women 0-1 health conditions Most affluent 0.7 (0.5–1.0) 0.6 (0.3–1.6) 1.0 (0.5–1.9) 0.5 (0.3–0.8)
Moderately affluent 0.7 (0.5–1.1) 0.8 (0.4–1.3) 3.5 (1.5–8.2) 0.7 (0.5–1.1)
Least affluent 0.8 (0.5–1.2) 0.4 (0.1–1.1) 1.1 (0.6–2.4) 1.1 (0.7–1.6)
2+ health conditions Most affluent 0.6 (0.4–0.9) 0.8 (0.3–1.8) 0.7 (0.4–1.3) 1.1 (0.9–1.3)
Moderately affluent 0.6 (0.4–0.8) 0.4 (0.1–1.3) 1.1 (0.6–2.0) 1.0 (0.8–1.2)
Least affluent 1.0 (0.7–1.4) 0.5 (0.2–1.8) 1.2 (0.7–2.0) 0.8 (0.7–1.0)